I’d like to start off a camera wishlist concerining various camera types and settings. I could only think of one off the top of my head.
1) Chromatic Abberation - should be available but turned off by default. A context menu tooltip should explain this stating that this distortion is something usually found on cheap cameras/lenses.
2) F-Stops for exposure control.
3) Ability to save out varying F-Stops to one single HDR file (starting to be found in new high-end digital cameras.)
4) Polarized lenses (possible?)
Well the new Physical Camera that they showed at Siggraph had many features. Chromatica Abberation was not included, and the be brutally honest, I really am glad. I think it is too gimicky. Why do I want Vray to look like I got a cheap camera.
Vray right now can save HDRI, EXR, and float TIFF images which basically saves a 32 bit floating point image so all the “f-stops.” BTW that is a lot higher dynamic range than RAW format which basically only saves 3 f-stops.
Polarized lenses? Why? I would say… do that in comp.
Well the new Physical Camera that they showed at Siggraph had many features. Chromatica Abberation was not included, and the be brutally honest, I really am glad. I think it is too gimicky. Why do I want Vray to look like I got a cheap camera.
i dunno, maybe if you want your render to look like a cheap camera? How can more options be a bad thing??
I think it is too gimicky. Why do I want Vray to look like I got a cheap camera.
For that reasoning, why not even bother using a camera at all? I understand that it’s reducing the quality and making something look cheap - but in some instances the more options available the better control of your desired output.
how about real internal lensflares hehe. actually i wonder how long it would take to computer a scene like a lens setup focusing light onto a film surface. i guess it would need alot of caustics huh