Corona for 1 additional software

Corona Corona Common Corona Common :: Porting and API
22

No one software frome these list dont needs corona-render so much as a cinema4d. It will be greate tool for architects and designers which prefer simplicity and logicality at work.
student-architect,designer

23

“From Russia with Love”)))…this is not spam, and not raid))) It is only the desire to give you as a developer, to understand that you have to go in the direction of the more popular products based on their specialization. Visualization as such.

24

this is not a raid, as my friends wrote

in Russia we have a very strong c4d community which was very impressed with your render and when we saw you`ve started a poll we start to give you our feedback.

25

+10
we need for Cinema 4D

26

I am an architect-designer, I have the desire to integrate corona in C4D. I WILL BUY! :smiley:

27

I will buy too. Has already prepared the money. :wink:

28

VRay for Cinema4D works like shit. I hate Stefan and Co cuz they don’t carry their promises about updates timeframe, bugs fix etc.

I think about Adobe and Maxon integreation. It seems that lots of ppl will start using C4D bcoz of this integratoin. Maybe you should also think about this :wink:

29

For users of C4D - this is very important. We are closely watching as developing Corona.
We can easily ensure the popularity of high-quality software in the Russian society C4D. We do free lessons and actively help new users to learn.

Regards.

30

Cinema 4D ofc

31

Yes, that is cool, altough I am a little bit worried about this:

l_1186_2964a64d2f1241eac5393e238d2de045.png
l_1186_2964a64d2f1241eac5393e238d2de045.png940×471 94.6 KB

32

Ok, after considering the options we have decided to start Corona for Cinema 4D.

33

This is excellent news!

34

Piracy is everywhere in Germany and in the U.S., but they did not ask for this information in Google, they use torrents.
Piracy should be seen as free advertising and PR.
A good example of a policy of Autodesk.
Usually at home can stand pirated version for training, but all the official studio buy software. And buying the software that is well known and it has a lot of experts.

Cinema is also very popular in France and Germany, I think that you will have success.

35

Corona it’s young and powerfull.
he has need a young and powerfull promising software like modo.

  • modo has merged with the foundry that it’s a huge place for promote corona.

  • modo has growing very fast and enter the vfx world with the foundry merge

  • the modo community is huge and ready for powerfull unbiased render.

  • support for developers in the forum are welcome

  • the modo user are all over the world not only in russia.

  • modo is cheap

  • you can do DR on unlimited render node for free

  • look at the modo gallery the huge amount of good render. but lack in real photorealism.

  • all modo product, kit, plugin (when they are usefull) sell well.

  • i’m not against c4d users so why not make for both c4d user and modo user

  • sotimage in production has already arnorld in place.

  • vray for most poeple is the saint graal (why ?? i don’t no) for archviz rendering. it integrated in all other app like c4d softimage maya max

  • modo learning and use is fast.

  • i could find many other arguments

    Free/very cheap licence and SDK for university students : YES
    Wide user base in need of a realistic renderer : YES
    General good health of the package (is fast, capable of production work, active development, generally bug-free, …) : YES
    Ease-of-use of the application for end users : YES

    Reasonable C++ API - I DONT KNOW BUT I THINK YES
    Plenty of documentation/example implementations of plugins I DONT KNOW
    Official support for developers (e.g. discussion forums) : YES

36

Sorry man ;). If I get additional programmer, or Cinema4D turns out to be not viable, modo will be considered again.

37

glad to hear this.
I hope you get more Dev to port it on both.
good luck

38

Looks like I missed the boat here.

I’d like to see a version as a standalone that I can export to from sketchup.

39

hi all

i would say that corona should be implemented in the major autodesk products:
3d max
maya
softimage

they work hand in hand and with this, corona can cover all aspects of 3d producton like archvis, animation, character animation, simulation, dynamic simulation, hair, particles, fluids, etc.

modo has already a very good renderer and with the new character animation tools, modo want to go in that “animation market”…the same goes for cinema4d.

my opinion…

40

hi guyzz,

why not for Rhino too?
would be great…

cheerzz

41

modo afaik have good and fast default render, c4d… don’t know, i use softimage and can descript situation from “inside SI”:

  • we have arnold with very good intergation, he best for outdoor and more instances (like forest or grass). You don’t war with arnold in this field. I like arnold, but he useless for indoor.
  • we have mental. He not good for indoor and can’t make BIG outdoor like arnold.
  • we have vray (now all have vray :)). All 3dmax users say he fast for indoor, need taught… or mb corona? SI users only recently have vray and still he don’t “took place” in hearts and minds. If corona a little bit better\faster\stable than vray for indoor you can easy get SI users

Sorry for my eng.

ps. SI have tool for “convert” (replace) shaders phong\architectural\etc - http://felixgeremus.com/?cat=3#mm_shadertools