# New PC

**URL:** <https://forums.chaos.com/t/new-pc/50636>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [August 3, 2014, 12:30am UTC](https://forums.chaos.com/t/new-pc/50636 "2014-08-03T00:30:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vizioen](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/chaosprd/user_avatar/forums.chaos.com/vizioen/32/59355_2.png) [@Vizioen](https://forums.chaos.com/u/Vizioen)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2014, 7:36am UTC](https://forums.chaos.com/t/new-pc/50636/5 "2014-08-04T07:36:48Z")

</div>

> [@Multimatte Element with Shave 7](https://forums.chaos.com/t/multimatte-element-with-shave-7/45243/3):
>
> Do gaming cards (geforece) not do a better job at viewport speed then the quadros? I only remember the quadros outperforming the gaming cards with certain simulation tasks.

I bought a K4000 and I’m fairly happy with it. I made my decision based on this test: [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-workstation-graphics-card,3493.html](http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-workstation-graphics-card,3493.html)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.chaos.com/t/new-pc/50636)._
