If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Exciting News: Chaos acquires EvolveLAB = AI-Powered Design.
To learn more, please visit this page!
New! You can now log in to the forums with your chaos.com account as well as your forum account.
it looks like you "Disable BBCode in this post" selected when you posted it. I unchecked that but I still can't seem to get it to recognize the [img] [/img]
I am still using still using the emitters albeit I have turned down the intensity a great deal (I suppose the multiplier represents lumens?).
I haven't figured out how to get the effect I am looking for with the new lights. the top planes of the pendant fixtures are set at about 1250 and the visable parts of the pendants and the wall sconces are set at 250.
Thanks,
Gunnar
(PS: The BBCode is set to "ON" although HTML is set to "OFF" under the forum options.)
You should replace those emitters with our Rectangle light - the emitters aren't sampled the same way as regular lights are and I believe that is the root cause of the various issues. The multiplier at this time is just a scalar multiplier - it does not have a physical unit attached to it yet.
There are several things that may be causing the light splotches. First of is the geometry of the scene itself. Check those edges and make sure they are touching or joined if possible. If there is a gap or the meshes don't interest then that can cause the light leaks. You may want to extend the faces so that they intersect just to make sure.
Secondly if you are using Irradiance mapping you can enable Check Sample Visibility. This basically determines whether a sample will contribute to a point's illumination, or whether it is on the other side of a face.
I am pretty sure the geometry is tight in this model. It seems strange that those light leaks occur at just about every single inside corner in the model. I know with Viz you could decrease the mesh size and/or check "regather indirect illumination" to solve splotchiness in corners. I didn't know if Vray had siome setting that would allow for more precision in problem areas like this.
Most of the settings under the options are greek to me. I hope the online manual that you all are working on will explain all these settings in layman's terms and give examples of what effect they might have on a rendering or why you might want to use them. That would be immensely helpful to a lot of us who have only dabbled in 3-d software before.
I have started replacing the emitters with the Vray rectangular lights and so far so good. However, the fact that these Vray lights won't render when they are inside a component or a group however is a huge problem, especially for large scenes. Gotta fix that one guys....
I replaced the emitter lights with all new Vray rectangular lights with the same multiplier settings. Here is the image with the original emitter lights:
The corner light leaks seem to be better (although they are definitely still there), but its hard to really tell if the rectangular Vray lights make a difference as the image was 800x600 as compared to the original emitter image which was 2048x1536. The geometry is tight. All the reveals in the door surround are made with the push/pull tool in sketchup (as are the coffers in the ceiling where the light leaks are particularly bad).
Here the astonishing part though: the larger image with the emitter lights took 9.5 hours to render. The second one took 3.5 hours just to render an eight of a 800x600 image. That would be 28 hours to render the whole thing. To render the same image at 2048x1536 it would take 6.5 times as long: 182 hours. Same image, same computer, nothing has changed except the type of lights.
Please, please tell me I am doing something wrong.
With the time you'll have to remember that the 3.5 hrs includes any precalcuations that are needed. From the looks of it your only doing a light cache calculation so I presume your using QMC for primary bounces. I definitely don't think it should be taking that long though. Your scene isn't that detailed, so you could switch to IR and see considerable speed increase and not to much of a difference.
A quick note about increasing the resolution of your image. You can actually get away with "lower quality settings" for a higher resolution image. This is because primary bounce engines such as ir and qmc are resolution dependant, meaning that the amount or size of the samples they take are based on the size of a pixel. With larger resolution renderings any given pixel is describing a smaller amount of the scene then at a lower resolution. Depending on how much you increase the resolution, you can make adjustments so that it doesn't take so many times longer than a lower resolution. I can post more details if people find this important.
Also post some details on your settings so we can see if there's anything that may becausing it to take so long. It might also be helpful to note subdivisions on glossy materials as that can effect things as well (I see you've got glossiess on the floor at least).
I have started replacing the emitters with the Vray rectangular lights and so far so good. However, the fact that these Vray lights won't render when they are inside a component or a group however is a huge problem, especially for large scenes. Gotta fix that one guys....
If I had let it finish it would have likely taken a little over 100 hours... Yikes. That is well over 10 times as long as the same scene with the emitter lights. Same scene, same resoution, rendered on the same machine. There really isn't that much difference in the quality of the renderings except the vray lights caused fewer light leaks (although they are still definitely there). I checked the geometry and it is fine.
I am using P4 3.4Ghz machine with 2GB of RAM.
The model is larger than you might imagine. What you are seeing in this rendering is a cross axis of this longer space with multiple light sources:
However, the 9.5 hour rendering involving the emitter lights had just as many light sources. I hope there is something I am overlooking because if there really is a 10 fold penalty for using the Vray lights I am inclined to just use the emitters and Photoshop the light leaks.
Gunnar
Here are the settings for the rendering in question (they have been the same for all renderings even the ones that use emitter lights)
My main suggestion is to switch your primary bounces from QMC to IR. QMC can get great results, but its main issue is time. In my opinion IR can achieve results that are nearly indistinguishable (to the eye) in significantly less time. Unless you have a distinct reason why you're using QMC, I would switch over. Also I might check what kind of subdivisions you are using on any glossy materials. That might also cause your rendering to slowdown unneccesarily.
Also within your LC settings I would enable Use for Glossy Rays as that will help speed up the rendering. Also if you have a single threaded machine you should change the Number of Passes from 4 to 1 (or 2 if you have 2 threads). This will allow you to skip the step of having to reconstruct those individual passes. Other than that I really can't say to much without sitting down and looking at it.
Thanks. I will try all of those suggestions when I leave to night to see what kind of speed difference I get.
But I still don't get why, with all other factors being the same, the v-ray lights caused a 10-fold increase in rendering time over emitting lights. That seems really steep to me.
If you have a lot of rect lights there can be a decent render time increase. Rect lights get sampled much more than simple emissive materials.
I think a 10x render time is a bit much as well, but without seeing your scene I cannot tell you for sure whats happening. Could you upload a copy of this file to ftp://ftp.asgvis.com/incoming ? Let me know the name of it if you do choose to send it to me.
Comment