Swan Warehouse

[glorybound]

I redid one of them. Very long render times and alot of strange things going on that I had to paint over in PS.

[glorybound]

Now I am pleased. I forgot to clamp the 1st ones bloom/glare, but it works for me. The 3rd one needs a little more bloom/glare, but I am done on this one.

[MANUEL_MOUSIOL]

Looking Good. What did you change?

[glorybound]

I just tweaked things. The render times were still 3-4 hours, so I haven't gotten that sorted out.

[glorybound]

Tell you what, the Microsoft Spring Update really messed with my computer. I think it is video because not even PS is working right. It'll all fix itself over time, but I don't remember a time in history were software updates have cause such inconveniences.

[MANUEL_MOUSIOL]

True. They are rushing those updates. Crazy times.

[mitviz]

those high render times with vray next?

[glorybound]

those high render times with vray next?

Yes, but it is probably me and not V-Ray NEXT. However, I just opened an exterior with 3.6 render times of 2 hours took 14 hours with V-Ray NEXT. Now, having said that, Windows Spring Update also happened during the same time frame. I just got a new Windows update, so we'll see if something fixes itself.

[mitviz]

Yes, but it is probably me and not V-Ray NEXT. However, I just opened an exterior with 3.6 render times of 2 hours took 14 hours with V-Ray NEXT. Now, having said that, Windows Spring Update also happened during the same time frame. I just got a new Windows update, so we'll see if something fixes itself.

ahh report back and lets see what happens, your not the first person i heard it from actually but from what i see online things should be only faster not slower

[jackieteh]

Hi Bobby, i see depth of field in your image, is that cause the slow rendering time? may be...

[fraggle]

Bobby, from my point of view the lighting is too uniformed. No mood can came out from too many lighting with equal intensity. Dark, bright area will bring more depth in the image.
But I know your client brief:
We would like to see everything, as bright as possible!

Good job.

[glorybound]

Hi Bobby, i see depth of field in your image, is that cause the slow rendering time? may be...

DOF stopped being a problem for me awhile back. I think it was more of a Windows Spring Update thing.

[glorybound]

Bobby, from my point of view the lighting is too uniformed. No mood can came out from too many lighting with equal intensity. Dark, bright area will bring more depth in the image.
But I know your client brief:
We would like to see everything, as bright as possible!

Good job.

I agree. I was thinking more of an architectural photographer for real-estate... you know... turn all the lights on. I do like contrast, so I'll keep that in mind next time.

[asifa]

Not the best images you've ever done but none the less they're pretty nice images! Is there any way you can talk about the process you use to get the light glare the way you do? Still using 3.6 (our office is slow to change)... PS brushes or in the VFB ? Do you use by material ? By channel? Any tips would be great

[glorybound]

Not the best images you've ever done but none the less they're pretty nice images! Is there any way you can talk about the process you use to get the light glare the way you do? Still using 3.6 (our office is slow to change)... PS brushes or in the VFB ? Do you use by material ? By channel? Any tips would be great

Yeah, I agree. Something about this one just didn't work. The glare is V-Ray, but I have to say, it is hit or miss.