Did anyone do any tests comparing viewport performance GTX 1080ti (or RTX 2080ti) vs GTX 1060 ??
I have 1080it in my main WS and I am planning to buy GPU for new rig. No GPU rendering, so only viewport perfomance matters.
As we all know the high-end GPUs absolutely do not guarantee great viewport performance. It is more 3DS max matter. .. but I guess there is still a difference between 1080ti and 1060. The only question is how big this difference in performance is? Will I notice it?
We are working on arhviz at the office. So scenes might get really big:
polly count up to 100-150 mln poly,
file size up too: 2GB
Xrefs: YES
external files count: up to 1000 files, a lot of proxies
external files total size: up to 5GB
Memory usage (before I press RENDER) up too: 40 GB
Below one of our heaviest file. A lot of interior stuff (that you can not see on the screenshot) makes this scene really, really heavy. As you can see the scene used all memory (11GB) and FPS score is just great: 2,17 ... So 1060 will be more sluggish with "only" 6GB of memory??
I have 1080it in my main WS and I am planning to buy GPU for new rig. No GPU rendering, so only viewport perfomance matters.
As we all know the high-end GPUs absolutely do not guarantee great viewport performance. It is more 3DS max matter. .. but I guess there is still a difference between 1080ti and 1060. The only question is how big this difference in performance is? Will I notice it?
We are working on arhviz at the office. So scenes might get really big:
polly count up to 100-150 mln poly,
file size up too: 2GB
Xrefs: YES
external files count: up to 1000 files, a lot of proxies
external files total size: up to 5GB
Memory usage (before I press RENDER) up too: 40 GB
Below one of our heaviest file. A lot of interior stuff (that you can not see on the screenshot) makes this scene really, really heavy. As you can see the scene used all memory (11GB) and FPS score is just great: 2,17 ... So 1060 will be more sluggish with "only" 6GB of memory??
Comment