Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GPU Render Benchmark Test for GTX470 + GTX680

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GPU Render Benchmark Test for GTX470 + GTX680

    Dear V-Ray users,

    today I tested the new GTX680 with GK104 Kepler GPU and GTX470 with GF100 Fermi GPU.

    The renders finished with reaching of 256 paths/pixel.

    Here are the results:

    GTX680
    Click image for larger version

Name:	prorender cpu benchmark gtx680.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	316.0 KB
ID:	874093
    rendered in 2min32s

    GTX470
    Click image for larger version

Name:	prorender cpu benchmark gtx470.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	310.4 KB
ID:	874094
    rendered in 3min28s

    Comparison:
    GTX680 Performance 137%
    GTX470 Performance 100%

    Regards
    Daniel Krüger

    www.prorender.de
    renderfarm & render service
    Last edited by prorender; 03-04-2012, 07:50 AM.
    www.prorender.de
    renderfarm & render service - cloud rendering

  • #2
    Nice; I just got my 680 too - can't wait to test it.

    Best regards,
    Vlado
    I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

    Comment


    • #3
      The 470 has 448 cores next to the 680's 1536. So we're seeing a 37% performance increase with well over 200% more cores.

      Well, let's see where we go from here...

      -Alan

      Comment


      • #4
        It has been pointed out that they are not the same cores... The CUDA cores in the 680 cards are much simpler and "dumber" than the ones in the Fermi cards. For the Kepler cards, the OpenCL/CUDA compiler must reorder the GPU code to achieve maximum performance - apparently it doesn't do that optimally just yet. For Fermi cards the reordering is apparently done by the hardware on the card itself. That's my understanding anyways...

        Best regards,
        Vlado
        I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

        Comment


        • #5
          The new cores are different from the old ones. They are not directly comparable. Also, there isn't a Kepler based Tesla yet, and probably GK104 was never meant for computing. If you remember, GTX480 was presented along with the Tesla cards. It was a high-end chip. GTX 680 is not a high-end chip. Read more carefully the specifications.
          V-Ray/PhoenixFD for Maya developer

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by vlado View Post
            It has been pointed out that they are not the same cores... The CUDA cores in the 680 cards are much simpler and "dumber" than the ones in the Fermi cards. For the Kepler cards, the OpenCL/CUDA compiler must reorder the GPU code to achieve maximum performance - apparently it doesn't do that optimally just yet. For Fermi cards the reordering is apparently done by the hardware on the card itself. That's my understanding anyways...

            Best regards,
            Vlado
            Ah, most interesting. Thanks for that bit of insight, Vlado, it is much appreciated. I wasn't expecting the same performance as the fermi. As I said, let's see where we go from here...

            -Alan

            Comment

            Working...
            X