i have always used a system where i have a "working" drive (2x ssd raid 0 at the moment) and that has a one way sync (using allways sync) to a mirrored pair of 6TB hard drives.
this works ok, and when the hard drives are full, i unplug them and store them as a pair of archives, and plug in a new pair of drives. i now have a stack of old drives.
however the older ones are sometimes unreadable and ive lost a fair amount of older work.. its never caused real problems as its generally suuper old stuff (10 years old+) but i dont like the unreliability. ive now started plugging the archive drives into an old pc i have, which doubles as a home theatre machine. that way the drives are regularly powered up so less likely to fail. however there is a limit to how many drives i can attach there, and it seems a waste of electricity.
SO. i am looking for a more elegant solution.. a friend suggested LTO tapes, but the cost seems very high, and in my experience in an office 10 years ago, its pretty clunky getting stuff back.
so, that leaves cloud backup/storage.
im going with the idea that the larger the company, the less risk of them going bust and losing your data. so amazon/google/microsoft etc.
anyone have a system setup they are happy with? what are the costs?
i looked briefly at amazon, but their tiers and pricing are very complicated.
(glacier storage seems cheapest, but has loads of caveats about time you must keep files, time to access them, extra charges for metadata etc... and i couldnt even work out if the prices were quoted as monthly or yearly!) if monthly, and if i understood correctly, its about 40 dollars a month for 10TB. however im not sure if you pay for a block and use as much as you need up to that limit, or you pay a changing rate depending on how much you have stored.
i just want something robust, cheap and simple.
any advice?
this works ok, and when the hard drives are full, i unplug them and store them as a pair of archives, and plug in a new pair of drives. i now have a stack of old drives.
however the older ones are sometimes unreadable and ive lost a fair amount of older work.. its never caused real problems as its generally suuper old stuff (10 years old+) but i dont like the unreliability. ive now started plugging the archive drives into an old pc i have, which doubles as a home theatre machine. that way the drives are regularly powered up so less likely to fail. however there is a limit to how many drives i can attach there, and it seems a waste of electricity.
SO. i am looking for a more elegant solution.. a friend suggested LTO tapes, but the cost seems very high, and in my experience in an office 10 years ago, its pretty clunky getting stuff back.
so, that leaves cloud backup/storage.
im going with the idea that the larger the company, the less risk of them going bust and losing your data. so amazon/google/microsoft etc.
anyone have a system setup they are happy with? what are the costs?
i looked briefly at amazon, but their tiers and pricing are very complicated.
(glacier storage seems cheapest, but has loads of caveats about time you must keep files, time to access them, extra charges for metadata etc... and i couldnt even work out if the prices were quoted as monthly or yearly!) if monthly, and if i understood correctly, its about 40 dollars a month for 10TB. however im not sure if you pay for a block and use as much as you need up to that limit, or you pay a changing rate depending on how much you have stored.
i just want something robust, cheap and simple.
any advice?
Comment