Tweet
Hi Archcanvas
you are right in the point of fast setups and great immages.
beside of this, usualy also this program has to do the step to transform maybe internal correct and more precise calculations to a simple rgb screen, and to suggest a collor, cause screens cant display the contrast and the wavelength of nature.
at this point each and every renderer fails, and like a photograph can decide to make immages brighter or darker, it allways depends on the artist how the immages look like.
maxwell reaches a higher step of realism by the cost of much much much longer calculations that mostover usual people event cant see. The hype of maxwell in its realy awsome immages, cant stand the affords of usualy fast deadlines. Also we have seen by the years now that for marketing people sometimes like to see things that arent "real" for example reflections in glasses that physicaly would never be correct , or brighter interiors seen from the outside of the window inside a building that are absolutely unrealistic.
what about the flexibility of maxwell to do fast and easy changes to a direction that customers usualy wish to get.
maxwell disclaims a unbiased system is the only way. Well this can be an aim, but i rather have the opportunity to make my renderings fast, and vray is the hell faster than maxwell.
nevertheless, it is good, this programm is there, so the competition also makes vray a greater product (skysystem and sunsystem .... )
my opinion only of course
you are right in the point of fast setups and great immages.
beside of this, usualy also this program has to do the step to transform maybe internal correct and more precise calculations to a simple rgb screen, and to suggest a collor, cause screens cant display the contrast and the wavelength of nature.
at this point each and every renderer fails, and like a photograph can decide to make immages brighter or darker, it allways depends on the artist how the immages look like.
maxwell reaches a higher step of realism by the cost of much much much longer calculations that mostover usual people event cant see. The hype of maxwell in its realy awsome immages, cant stand the affords of usualy fast deadlines. Also we have seen by the years now that for marketing people sometimes like to see things that arent "real" for example reflections in glasses that physicaly would never be correct , or brighter interiors seen from the outside of the window inside a building that are absolutely unrealistic.
what about the flexibility of maxwell to do fast and easy changes to a direction that customers usualy wish to get.
maxwell disclaims a unbiased system is the only way. Well this can be an aim, but i rather have the opportunity to make my renderings fast, and vray is the hell faster than maxwell.
nevertheless, it is good, this programm is there, so the competition also makes vray a greater product (skysystem and sunsystem .... )
my opinion only of course
, matters of opinions and needs
Comment