I saw this over on the maxwell forum. That whole thing is really getting annoying. The maxwellians still want to say that they can compare that bloated beast of a render engine to other production engines. You can't! It's not usable in production. Anyway, somebody there posted this image, with no explanation or specs on the renders. Just said. Comparison render at 20 minutes. That's a crock of you know what!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
comparison renders
Collapse
X
-
haha lovely. compairing a non biased renderer, rendering with hits native method(maxwell), to another renderer (vray) who's nonbiased method is practically a thrown in toy. Honestly's if vray's image had less noise then maxwell's, the uproar would have been stupendous.
Oh, and I thought maxwell incorporated some sort of noise reduction into its renders as well.
-
"Dear Maxwell User,
Please post your scene so we can show you how to use Vray."
Comment
-
No kidding. Vray's image is obviously sabotaged. My favorite part is the BusyRay render. IMO, it looks better than Maxwell! And the price difference....
Why would I buy Maxwell again?sigpic
J. Scott Smith Visual Designs
https://jscottsmith.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jscottsmith​
http://www.facebook.com/jssvisualdesigns​
Comment
-
This was my response.
I don't understand. DId you render each scene in the engine labeled? If so, why are they grainy? I've never seen other engines produce grainy results unless the person who setup the render didn't understand the settings. Also, are you suggesting that each one took 20 minutes to render? Can you expand your explanation of the settings for each, machine specs etc.? Thanks.
This was his!
the calculation has been activated with,
therefore 4 render at the same time
not arriving to a noise acceptable.
Comment
-
If somebody want to ask about scene or whatever
http://www.maxwellrender.com/forum/v...tion+activatedI just can't seem to trust myself
So what chance does that leave, for anyone else?
---------------------------------------------------------
CG Artist
Comment
-
Originally posted by Paul OblomovIf somebody want to ask about scene or whatever
http://www.maxwellrender.com/forum/v...tion+activated
Comment
-
Comment
-
Look at this new post! WTF? He is obviously just trying to make the vray render look bad. B.S.!
http://www.maxwellrender.com/forum/v...ic.php?t=18127
Comment
-
I know ISMA and He is not for one engine against another especially against vray he likes to tests the ngines to find the most precise or the one u like more as anyone of us would do.
I can have the scene but He proposes to do tests and explaining the parameters and technique
in next msg i'll pos his scene I'm uploading it
Workstation: Asus p9x79WS I7 3930K Noctua NH-D14@4200GHz SE2011 16GB RAM Kingston Hyperx Beast SSD 500Gb Samsung x2 SATA3 WD raid edition4 64MB GTX760 2GB DDR5 CoolerMaster 690III
https://www.facebook.com/essetreddi..../photos_albums
Comment
-
Nice. Waiting
And would be great, if you tell us his PC specs.
edit
BTW - lower your monitor gamma - I can clearly see some regular patterns on walls.I just can't seem to trust myself
So what chance does that leave, for anyone else?
---------------------------------------------------------
CG Artist
Comment
-
scene here:
http://rapidshare.de/files/29391483/...flash.zip.html
textures here:
http://rapidshare.de/files/29398427/textures.zip.html
he used PPT to calculate vray solution with a vraylight at windows
he used dual opteron 265 and about RAM 4 GigaBytes
Me and him will wait the tests of the interested vray users
Workstation: Asus p9x79WS I7 3930K Noctua NH-D14@4200GHz SE2011 16GB RAM Kingston Hyperx Beast SSD 500Gb Samsung x2 SATA3 WD raid edition4 64MB GTX760 2GB DDR5 CoolerMaster 690III
https://www.facebook.com/essetreddi..../photos_albums
Comment
-
Someone should just smack this down with a straight LWF render.
Comment
Comment