Ok, so I just got a fancy new 42" HD plasma w/ 1080i res and 10k contrast ratio. Now, the next step. Upgrading the rest of my equipment. Now I find out about all these nifty cables. It seems to make sense to me that if i'm using a dvd player with HDMI out, and that goes to the tv via HDMI cable, then only one device does the processing, say the dvd player, then sends a seperated, uncompressed/encoded signal to the tv, where it's displayed natively. vs. player converting sending through analog component cable or s-video cable to tv, where the tv has to uncompres and display.
Is this right? I've read that it doesn't matter whether you use HDMI or component, but that doesn't make sense since to send through component, the signal has to be compressed and encoded with an rf to be sent over the wires. Red, blue, green component is supposed to be better, but still compressed/encoded, vs hdmi being all channels uncompressed. So both devices (dvd and tv) have to do more processing to display the signal.???? Any A/V home theatre experts here?
Is this right? I've read that it doesn't matter whether you use HDMI or component, but that doesn't make sense since to send through component, the signal has to be compressed and encoded with an rf to be sent over the wires. Red, blue, green component is supposed to be better, but still compressed/encoded, vs hdmi being all channels uncompressed. So both devices (dvd and tv) have to do more processing to display the signal.???? Any A/V home theatre experts here?
Comment