Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
quad cores are for losers!
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
-
Wow.Microsoft Word will be smokin' with 80 cores! I think we'd definitely need a new benchmark for V-Ray too, sorry Percy.
www.dpict3d.com - "That's a very nice rendering, Dave. I think you've improved a great deal." - HAL9000... At least I have one fan.
Comment
-
So, in DR, you are limited to 10 machines, so it is 10 x 80 buckets, so 800 buckets, hummmmmm... ok, just daydreamin' out loudAlain Blanchette
www.pixistudio.com
Comment
-
With power like that, Vray (or any other physically accurate rendering engine for that matter) would have no need for all of the rendering options we have currently. It would just render everything in pure PPT with millions of samples - all materials would be designed for the perfect result and caustics and other volumetric phenomenon would just always be there and be perfect as a result. Whoa...
Comment
-
Originally posted by percydamanOriginally posted by dlparisiWow.Microsoft Word will be smokin' with 80 cores! I think we'd definitely need a new benchmark for V-Ray too, sorry Percy.
Yes, percy, that maybe something like hard SSS with 300 subdivision on the glossy refractions, etc... :P :P
Best regards,
nikki Candelero.:: FREE Your MINDs, LIVE Your IDEAS ::.
Comment
-
Originally posted by thablanchSo, in DR, you are limited to 10 machines, so it is 10 x 80 buckets, so 800 buckets, hummmmmm... ok, just daydreamin' out loud
However network rendering would be a cool thing...imagine 10 machines and you have as many cpus as orphanage hasDmitry Vinnik
Silhouette Images Inc.
ShowReel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxSJlvSwAhA
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dmitry-v...-identity-name
Comment
-
Comment