Lately, I keep getting outbid by people from the 3rd world whenever i bid for a project that's not somewhere in my immediate vicinity.
I'm surprised that there is no ongoing thread on this subject, as I'm sure that a majority of us has dealt with unfair competition at some point or another in the last few years.
I kept looking for similar threads on this subject on a number of CGI/archviz forums, and most of them were pretty outdated with arguments that have been proven as wrong by now.
First to demystify some of the popular ideas.
1.) The communication problem - I don't think that it is a problem anymore. You can probably get a better line when using skype than when calling someone on their cell phone.
2.)The language barrier - While people complain that it gets hard to outsource to China for this very reason, the problem is non-existent when outsourcing to India.
3.)The quality - It's been greatly improved, to say that something is not good simply because its coming from over seas, is bogus.[/list]
4.)The fact that companies that deal with projects that are worth millions of dollars won't bother to save a few dollars by going overseas for something as not as important... well I never confirmed this as a fact. From my experience, yes even the richest clients will settle for a much lower price even if it means lower quality.
Another thing that surprised me is that a lot of people justify this competition as being fair, mentioning the free market, the global market, the fact that it's not just 3d that suffers and so on.
But another topic, which is rarely brought up is the issue of software piracy, which I believe, plays the most important role in this story.
OK so, global outsourcing has been around for a while, factories have been moved to cheaper economies, nowadays big companies all have their call centers in India, we all know the story about that doctor that sends x-rays to his colleague in India, and so on.
What bothers me is the fact that when a really large Company decides to outsource their production to a country like India, it has to make some serious investments - expenses. You can't set up a complex call center operation without a building and without equipment. The same thing goes for a factory, one needs to be built, and that's a considerable investment.
It's not like any Punjab Joe can set up his own operation and challenge the likes of dell. He has to wait for dell to be gracious enough to walk in with capital investments.
With 3d, especially with our line of work, it's a much different story. I am terrified with the way things are unfolding.
Investments are almost non-existant for two reasons. What used to be a $10k workstation just a few years back, it's now replaced by an inexpensive $1k rig. Everyone can afford to render.
Software is really expensive... for us. While you have to earn thousands of dollars to buy software, and upgrade it, our counterparts from the third world can simply download it for free.
While it's not feasible to spend too much money on latest updates, when you can get it for free it makes perfect sense!
And at last, the biggest threat of them all - EVERMOTION. At first i thought that the whole world having access to free high quality models was ridiculous, but when they started releasing fully set-up scenes, I was stunned.
Buying all that stuff, like libraries, training dvds, may turn out to be quite a hefty sum, and i'm sure that you always think twice before buying something like that. But when you're clicking on download links, i guess that the only thing you have to worry about it if you can afford another harddrive, because thats a very luxurious item for someone who thinks that 150 dollars is a fortune.
I could call the 3rd world competition fair, if there was no such thing as software piracy. It would probably take 50 years for people there to save enough money to buy all the equipment and software that they need, which means that we would have only companies that shifted their production to cheap markets, to deal with.
And if you invest 100.000 dollars for 10 workstations, you won't go charging $100 for your renderings. You'll pay the poor CAD or rendering monkey $100 dollars, and you'll charge $5000 on your end.
And finally, this is the latest email that i've received.
http://www.archicadd.com/
The flashing $10/hr is the worst detail, it's looks like a porn site.
Now tell me, how many $10 hours do you think it takes to afford all the software and all the libraries that you own, and how much money would you be left with afterwards?
I'm surprised that there is no ongoing thread on this subject, as I'm sure that a majority of us has dealt with unfair competition at some point or another in the last few years.
I kept looking for similar threads on this subject on a number of CGI/archviz forums, and most of them were pretty outdated with arguments that have been proven as wrong by now.
First to demystify some of the popular ideas.
1.) The communication problem - I don't think that it is a problem anymore. You can probably get a better line when using skype than when calling someone on their cell phone.
2.)The language barrier - While people complain that it gets hard to outsource to China for this very reason, the problem is non-existent when outsourcing to India.
3.)The quality - It's been greatly improved, to say that something is not good simply because its coming from over seas, is bogus.[/list]
4.)The fact that companies that deal with projects that are worth millions of dollars won't bother to save a few dollars by going overseas for something as not as important... well I never confirmed this as a fact. From my experience, yes even the richest clients will settle for a much lower price even if it means lower quality.
Another thing that surprised me is that a lot of people justify this competition as being fair, mentioning the free market, the global market, the fact that it's not just 3d that suffers and so on.
But another topic, which is rarely brought up is the issue of software piracy, which I believe, plays the most important role in this story.
OK so, global outsourcing has been around for a while, factories have been moved to cheaper economies, nowadays big companies all have their call centers in India, we all know the story about that doctor that sends x-rays to his colleague in India, and so on.
What bothers me is the fact that when a really large Company decides to outsource their production to a country like India, it has to make some serious investments - expenses. You can't set up a complex call center operation without a building and without equipment. The same thing goes for a factory, one needs to be built, and that's a considerable investment.
It's not like any Punjab Joe can set up his own operation and challenge the likes of dell. He has to wait for dell to be gracious enough to walk in with capital investments.
With 3d, especially with our line of work, it's a much different story. I am terrified with the way things are unfolding.
Investments are almost non-existant for two reasons. What used to be a $10k workstation just a few years back, it's now replaced by an inexpensive $1k rig. Everyone can afford to render.
Software is really expensive... for us. While you have to earn thousands of dollars to buy software, and upgrade it, our counterparts from the third world can simply download it for free.
While it's not feasible to spend too much money on latest updates, when you can get it for free it makes perfect sense!
And at last, the biggest threat of them all - EVERMOTION. At first i thought that the whole world having access to free high quality models was ridiculous, but when they started releasing fully set-up scenes, I was stunned.
Buying all that stuff, like libraries, training dvds, may turn out to be quite a hefty sum, and i'm sure that you always think twice before buying something like that. But when you're clicking on download links, i guess that the only thing you have to worry about it if you can afford another harddrive, because thats a very luxurious item for someone who thinks that 150 dollars is a fortune.
I could call the 3rd world competition fair, if there was no such thing as software piracy. It would probably take 50 years for people there to save enough money to buy all the equipment and software that they need, which means that we would have only companies that shifted their production to cheap markets, to deal with.
And if you invest 100.000 dollars for 10 workstations, you won't go charging $100 for your renderings. You'll pay the poor CAD or rendering monkey $100 dollars, and you'll charge $5000 on your end.
And finally, this is the latest email that i've received.
http://www.archicadd.com/
The flashing $10/hr is the worst detail, it's looks like a porn site.
Now tell me, how many $10 hours do you think it takes to afford all the software and all the libraries that you own, and how much money would you be left with afterwards?
Comment