If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Exciting News: Chaos acquires EvolveLAB = AI-Powered Design.
To learn more, please visit this page!
New! You can now log in to the forums with your chaos.com account as well as your forum account.
That's very nice, however keep in mind that Windows has a hard limit of 64 logical cores per application. If a single application wants to run on more than 64 logical cores, some special programming is required.
So 18 physical cores is 36 logical (with HT); if you put two processors, that becomes 72 and is above the 64-core Windows limit.
That's very nice, however keep in mind that Windows has a hard limit of 64 logical cores per application. If a single application wants to run on more than 64 logical cores, some special programming is required.
So 18 physical cores is 36 logical (with HT); if you put two processors, that becomes 72 and is above the 64-core Windows limit.
That's very nice, however keep in mind that Windows has a hard limit of 64 logical cores per application. If a single application wants to run on more than 64 logical cores, some special programming is required.
So 18 physical cores is 36 logical (with HT); if you put two processors, that becomes 72 and is above the 64-core Windows limit.
Best regards,
Vlado
So a dual CPU 16-core Xeon system = 64 logical = ideal. Interesting.
Alex York
Founder of Atelier York - Bespoke Architectural Visualisation www.atelieryork.co.uk
That's very nice, however keep in mind that Windows has a hard limit of 64 logical cores per application. If a single application wants to run on more than 64 logical cores, some special programming is required.
So 18 physical cores is 36 logical (with HT); if you put two processors, that becomes 72 and is above the 64-core Windows limit.
You are such a spoil sport! Let us fantasize for a moment.
www.dpict3d.com - "That's a very nice rendering, Dave. I think you've improved a great deal." - HAL9000... At least I have one fan.
Actually, that core limit isn't a bad thing. It just means you'll be able to do other stuff with other programs while most of your computer is busy rendering.
Actually, that core limit isn't a bad thing. It just means you'll be able to do other stuff with other programs while most of your computer is busy rendering.
I'm not to sure about that...those 8 cores still wont fire up when Max is rendering with 64-cores, so I think...
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
Thomas A. Edison
just write to microsoft and tell them to get their shit together. In fact I think they will soon enough once these chips become widely available. Windows 9 ?
Comment