Originally posted by glorybound
View Post
I'm just repeating what everyone else has said but basically, saying "how much should I charge per second?" is like saying "how much should I charge per pixel" - there *is* a correlation, i.e. more pixels = larger image = (theoretically) longer to create, but it's a terrible yardstick for to gauge your fees by.
Imagine if you quote $100 per second for a 30 second fly-through, but the client decides the camera move is too quick and wants to make it 60 seconds. Would you really bill them and extra $3000 for changing a couple of values?
Comment