Hi all;
I've been an architectural designer for years, and have also been doing arch viz via the NPR route for a long time, mostly digital watercolor, etc.
My current workflow is to design/model in Revit, export to Skecth Up for details and to produce linework/shadows and then export into Piranesi/PS/Painter for "painting" etc.
I perform no rendering in the pure 3d photo-real sense at all at this point. All of my watercolors are produced inside Piranesi (painting on planar surfaces), or produced as exported flat lineworks that are digitally painted in PS/Painter.
So while I'm a pretty nifty modeler/painter of linework, I'm bunk when it comes to 3d rendering.
I'm breaking into PR now, and I'm going with V-Ray, but I am absolutely confused as to how to go about setting up my workflow, and in particular, which program to run V-Ray inside of. I own copies of Max Design 2014, Sketch-Up, and I also have Maya. I will continue (presumably until I no longer need it) to produce my main architectural models in Revit mostly because I kinda kick butt with it, but I also know Sketch-Up pretty well also.
So why not just roll with V-Ray for Sketch-Up?
"Something" is yelling at me that I should be perform my rendering in Max or Maya, because for some weird reason I "feel" like those programs will produce better results than Sketch-Up. Also, for fairly obvious reasons, I feel like I'd sort of be faking it if I didn't get to know Max inside and out. It seems like a must for an architectural visualization artist. I am also intrigued by Maya, but I'm not sure if it's the right tool for arch-viz.
So basically I am not knowing if I should purchase V-Ray for Max, for Sketch-up, or for Maya. I suppose the biggest reason I just don't jump on the Sketch Up bandwagon is because I feel like eventually I'd be held back by it's limitations, even though I know it and am unfamiliar with Max/Maya.
So I'm wondering what some of you-all might do if you were in my rather complicated shoes. I've got all the software a guy could want, but it seems I must choose only one for my rendering duties.
Would some of you go with the familiar (Sketch-Up), and take a chance you would be held back by it's perceived limitations, or would you place your smart money on the long term more mature/robust packages? Or am I being unfair to Sketch-Up, and does V-Ray even care? Likewise, I am wondering if one of the three would be best because of considerations like available content, 3rd party support, features.
Also, am I mistaken that V-Ray 3 will run inside any program, or is that feature limited to the "node" (whatever that means to a rank ameture like myself)? In other words, could I run it on any program I have so long as it remains on a single workstation?
Since I fly solo, I will be running all my softwares on a single workstation. It currently has 16g ram, an ssd program drive (conventional drives for data), an over-clocked ivory-bridge running stable and cool at 4.5 ghz (on water for 8 months) and it currently has an AMD 7970 (I wonder if that is a limitation as well)...
Thanks so much to any that take the time to help a total newb to begin the rise from the primordial muck. I'll sure appreciate it, and wish you all health and happiness.
Cheers,
BillyG.
I've been an architectural designer for years, and have also been doing arch viz via the NPR route for a long time, mostly digital watercolor, etc.
My current workflow is to design/model in Revit, export to Skecth Up for details and to produce linework/shadows and then export into Piranesi/PS/Painter for "painting" etc.
I perform no rendering in the pure 3d photo-real sense at all at this point. All of my watercolors are produced inside Piranesi (painting on planar surfaces), or produced as exported flat lineworks that are digitally painted in PS/Painter.
So while I'm a pretty nifty modeler/painter of linework, I'm bunk when it comes to 3d rendering.
I'm breaking into PR now, and I'm going with V-Ray, but I am absolutely confused as to how to go about setting up my workflow, and in particular, which program to run V-Ray inside of. I own copies of Max Design 2014, Sketch-Up, and I also have Maya. I will continue (presumably until I no longer need it) to produce my main architectural models in Revit mostly because I kinda kick butt with it, but I also know Sketch-Up pretty well also.
So why not just roll with V-Ray for Sketch-Up?
"Something" is yelling at me that I should be perform my rendering in Max or Maya, because for some weird reason I "feel" like those programs will produce better results than Sketch-Up. Also, for fairly obvious reasons, I feel like I'd sort of be faking it if I didn't get to know Max inside and out. It seems like a must for an architectural visualization artist. I am also intrigued by Maya, but I'm not sure if it's the right tool for arch-viz.
So basically I am not knowing if I should purchase V-Ray for Max, for Sketch-up, or for Maya. I suppose the biggest reason I just don't jump on the Sketch Up bandwagon is because I feel like eventually I'd be held back by it's limitations, even though I know it and am unfamiliar with Max/Maya.
So I'm wondering what some of you-all might do if you were in my rather complicated shoes. I've got all the software a guy could want, but it seems I must choose only one for my rendering duties.
Would some of you go with the familiar (Sketch-Up), and take a chance you would be held back by it's perceived limitations, or would you place your smart money on the long term more mature/robust packages? Or am I being unfair to Sketch-Up, and does V-Ray even care? Likewise, I am wondering if one of the three would be best because of considerations like available content, 3rd party support, features.
Also, am I mistaken that V-Ray 3 will run inside any program, or is that feature limited to the "node" (whatever that means to a rank ameture like myself)? In other words, could I run it on any program I have so long as it remains on a single workstation?
Since I fly solo, I will be running all my softwares on a single workstation. It currently has 16g ram, an ssd program drive (conventional drives for data), an over-clocked ivory-bridge running stable and cool at 4.5 ghz (on water for 8 months) and it currently has an AMD 7970 (I wonder if that is a limitation as well)...
Thanks so much to any that take the time to help a total newb to begin the rise from the primordial muck. I'll sure appreciate it, and wish you all health and happiness.
Cheers,
BillyG.
Comment