I was attending a webinar about the future of architectural visualization a few weeks ago, where there was a lot of focus on Enscape, and basically none about Vantage. That really surprised me. There was this guy presenting things like Enscape was the only outcome. I don't think Vantage was mentioned at all.
This lights a huge red light to me about your strategy favoring Enscape, and the logics then tells me that you are planning on merging Vantage's features into Enscape in the near future to form a complete package.
Can somebody from Chaos chime in here? What is the future of Vantage in your vision of the future of archviz? I don't see logics with all your acquisition if the plan isn't merging products. (As a sidenote: Also the same with vray/corona, what can possible be the positive outcome from maintaining two products that are forming competitors in the market of 3d models etc)
Our studio uses Vantage on a regular basis now, both for previz and for production, and it works better and better for every update.
However, if eg all future animated assets are going to be implemented in Enscape and not Vantage, then I need to revise our workflow, because we want to be ahead on these features. We are waiting for animated objects coming to Vantage. Our studio also spend time (money) on implementing and optimizing our workflow, and right now Vantage is a centerpiece in our software strategy. Would rather not spend too much on implementing Vantage in our studio if it's not the future.
This lights a huge red light to me about your strategy favoring Enscape, and the logics then tells me that you are planning on merging Vantage's features into Enscape in the near future to form a complete package.
Can somebody from Chaos chime in here? What is the future of Vantage in your vision of the future of archviz? I don't see logics with all your acquisition if the plan isn't merging products. (As a sidenote: Also the same with vray/corona, what can possible be the positive outcome from maintaining two products that are forming competitors in the market of 3d models etc)
Our studio uses Vantage on a regular basis now, both for previz and for production, and it works better and better for every update.
However, if eg all future animated assets are going to be implemented in Enscape and not Vantage, then I need to revise our workflow, because we want to be ahead on these features. We are waiting for animated objects coming to Vantage. Our studio also spend time (money) on implementing and optimizing our workflow, and right now Vantage is a centerpiece in our software strategy. Would rather not spend too much on implementing Vantage in our studio if it's not the future.
Comment