Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Strong Surface mode

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    regarding scale, that's a significant param as i'm sure you're aware. a wedge test with different scene scales goes a long way, however i've found thus far that Chaos has it tied to real world scale versus behavior very well.

    Comment


    • #17
      this is an expected problem with very high res. to keep proper behavior you have to increase the spf when increase the resolution, otherwise unnatural waves appear and the surface becomes blobby. that's why we are focused on the flip solver, it does not need to increase the spf and therefore is better for high res simulations. however, it still has no foam and i suppose you will need foam over the river. for now try to increase the spf, and i will attract the coworker who made this scene to the discussion.
      ______________________________________________
      VRScans developer

      Comment


      • #18
        I have no idea what a wedge test is but my scene is set up to real world scale

        Comment


        • #19
          ah sorry. a small set of sims with differing values starting from low to high. in this case, low scale to high scale to see the different results you get - that is, if the other params aren't resolving the issue. if they are, i'd stick with real world scale for your river.

          Comment


          • #20
            so I shouldn't need Strong surface mode on if I just increase the spf?

            Comment


            • #21
              yes, if you increase the spf there is no need of strong surface.
              let me explain more about this problem. actually it is related to the advection, the stage that moves the liquid in the grid. if for single simulation step the liquid travels too big distance, the simulation tends to form artificial waves and the liquid surface is disturbed. the solution is simple - increase the spf, this will decrease the distance traveled in single step and the simulation will get smoother. however, this is leads to longer simulation times. if you increase the spf twice, the simulation time will be doubled. so, keep it as low as possible. perhaps you have to make initial tests with shorter grid, that covers only the starting point of the liquid, and when you find the best spf, you can extend it to the desired size.
              ______________________________________________
              VRScans developer

              Comment


              • #22
                hi,

                as @ttdww mentioned it's a good idea to work in realscale. In the video that I made the riverbed is 22m long, 9m wide and 7m high.
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DimensionsRight.png
Views:	1
Size:	96.5 KB
ID:	854462
                What I did in the Liquids tab is I've turned off the: Wetting, Static surfaces correction and Strong surface mode.
                I've enabled the "Initial fillup" in order to have the riverbed full of water in the first frame (no need to wait for the emitter to fill the entire riverbed).
                Click image for larger version

Name:	Initial fillup.png
Views:	1
Size:	188.3 KB
ID:	854463
                And also decreased the Sharpness to 0.5
                Click image for larger version

Name:	Mesh.png
Views:	1
Size:	321.7 KB
ID:	854464


                As for the dynamics: Symmetric conservation with quality of 30 and Classic advection with SPF: 2.0 is fine.
                Here's the parameters. I'm also working on a tutorial for the River now, so you'll be able to watch it soon.
                Click image for larger version

Name:	river_settings.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	140.1 KB
ID:	854465

                Regards,
                Tsetso
                Tsvetan Milanov
                Chaos

                Comment


                • #23
                  thanks Tsetso - awesome work. I think the sharpness might be the key.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X