Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

VRay CPU render don't use full cores?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • VRay CPU render don't use full cores?

    VRay sdk version: appsdk-win_qt5-nightly-vray_v5.20.24-20221205
    OS: Windows Server 2022 standard

    In rendering, I found CPU utilization is not always 100%. so, what settings I should change?
    Click image for larger version  Name:	hahaha.jpg Views:	0 Size:	189.5 KB ID:	1172195
    my code is simple:
    Code:
    renderer.RenderMode = RenderMode.PRODUCTION;
    renderer.SetImprovedDefaultSettings(VRayRenderer.D efaultsPreset.High);
    renderer.StartSync();
    renderer.WaitForRenderEnd();
    ​​​​

  • #2
    Hi! A few questions:

    1. progressive or bucket production mode? Do you have a noise limit if it's progressive?
    2. Are you able to test with version 6 and tell us whether it's the same?
    3. Can you export a .vrscene-file and check whether it's the same in V-Ray Standalone (vray.exe)?
    4. Can you send us a sample .vrscene-file to reproduce the issue on our side?

    Comment


    • #3
      What is progressive or bucket production mode? any demo code?

      Comment


      • #4
        stanislav.kirilov
        Click image for larger version  Name:	image.png Views:	0 Size:	478.1 KB ID:	1172792
        Using vray-benchmark, all cores all used constantly. so, it's bug of vray sdk?

        Comment


        • #5
          This is VRay standalone (vraystd_adv_60020_x64_vc14), I still can't use all cores.
          Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	317
Size:	578.7 KB
ID:	1172794

          Comment


          • #6
            SettingsImageSampler plugin controls the image sampler type. SettingsImageSampler::type accepts values: 0 - fixed rate, 1 - adaptive, 2 [deprecated] - adaptive subdivision, 3 - progressive.
            You cannot directly compare to V-Ray Benchmark as most probably you use different scenes.

            Comment


            • #7
              SettingsImageSampler type is 3

              Code:
              SettingsImageSampler settingsIS {
              type=3;
              min_shade_rate=6;
              fixed_subdivs=1;
              dmc_minSubdivs=1;
              dmc_maxSubdivs=18;
              dmc_threshold=0.01;
              subdivision_minRate=-1;
              subdivision_maxRate=2;
              subdivision_jitter=1;
              subdivision_threshold=0.1;
              subdivision_edges=0;
              subdivision_normals=0;
              subdivision_normals_threshold=0.05;
              progressive_minSubdivs=1;
              progressive_maxSubdivs=100;
              progressive_threshold=0.01;
              progressive_maxTime=0;
              progressive_bundleSize=128;
              progressive_showMask=0;
              progressive_progNoiseThreshold=80;
              progressive_effectsUpdate=10;
              render_mask_mode=0;
              render_mask_clear=0;
              progressive_autoswitch_effectsresult=1;
              }
              just can't make full use of CPU cores.​

              Comment


              • #8
                Try lowering the value of progressive_bundleSize, a higher rendering resolution (if your scene is too "light"). Then try bucket rendering by setting SettingsImageSampler::type=1. It would be good if you can test with version 6 as well.

                Comment


                • #9
                  stanislav.kirilov

                  I had changed the type of SettingsImageSampler to 1:

                  Code:
                  SettingsImageSampler imageSampler = SettingsImageSampler.GetInstance(renderer, "settingsIS");
                  imageSampler.SettingsImageSamplerType = 1;
                  however, I exported the vrscene file via renderer.Export, I still got
                  Code:
                  SettingsImageSampler settingsIS {
                  type=3;
                  min_shade_rate=6;
                  fixed_subdivs=1;
                  dmc_minSubdivs=1;
                  dmc_maxSubdivs=18;
                  dmc_threshold=0.01;
                  subdivision_minRate=-1;
                  subdivision_maxRate=2;
                  subdivision_jitter=1;
                  subdivision_threshold=0.1;
                  subdivision_edges=0;
                  subdivision_normals=0;
                  subdivision_normals_threshold=0.05;
                  progressive_minSubdivs=1;
                  progressive_maxSubdivs=100;
                  progressive_threshold=0.01;
                  progressive_maxTime=0;
                  progressive_bundleSize=128;
                  progressive_showMask=0;
                  progressive_progNoiseThreshold=80;
                  progressive_effectsUpdate=10;
                  render_mask_mode=0;
                  render_mask_clear=0;
                  progressive_autoswitch_effectsresult=1;
                  }
                  bug here?​​

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    And also I found that using Bucket rendering, bumpMap will be affected.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I tried your 2 lines of code to change the sampler type and then Export and the sampler type was changed. If you loaded a vrscene after you had made the change, it wouldn't work.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        oh, I have found the reason, my full code is

                        Code:
                        SettingsImageSampler imageSampler = SettingsImageSampler.GetInstance(renderer, "settingsIS");
                        imageSampler.SettingsImageSamplerType = 1;​
                        renderer.SetImprovedDefaultSettings(VRayRenderer.D efaultsPreset.High);
                        Code:
                        SetImprovedDefaultSettings(VRayRenderer.DefaultsPreset.High);
                        will change the sampler type to 1.
                        so, progressive is better than bucket rendering?
                        And
                        Code:
                        SettingsRTEngine settingsRTEngine {
                        cpu_bundle_size=128;
                        cpu_samples_per_pixel=4;
                        gpu_bundle_size=192;
                        gpu_samples_per_pixel=16;
                        opencl_resizeTextures=0;
                        opencl_textureFormat=2;
                        progressive_samples_per_pixel=1;
                        undersampling=2;
                        noise_threshold=0.01;
                        max_draw_interval=150;
                        min_draw_interval=50;
                        }
                        Lower the noise_threshold value can make bucket rendering better?​

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X