If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Exciting News: Chaos acquires EvolveLAB = AI-Powered Design.
To learn more, please visit this page!
New! You can now log in to the forums with your chaos.com account as well as your forum account.
It seemed to me, Paul, that the latin super cube sampler does a better job at sharper detail like fine creases and corners, than the standard one.
In both ppt and LC mode.
It's also slightly slower, but only marginally.
Please note it's an idea i have from soe personal tests, not something i heard anywhere from official sources
This particular scene would render with different speed compared to the older version, since there were some bugs in the 1.47.03 build (particularly with refractive materials) that made it take more shortcuts than it should (particularly for back-side reflections, I think).
As for the Latin supercube sampling, it is another way of combining pure qmc sampling with some random numbers to avoid some potential sampling artifacts. This is most obvious in PPT mode, where the default sampling may produce moire patterns over the image. Those go away with more samples, but can be somewhat distracting. The Latin supercube method does not suffer from this particular problem, although it tends to be slightly slower.
Best regards,
Vlado
I just can't seem to trust myself
So what chance does that leave, for anyone else?
---------------------------------------------------------
CG Artist
That's why, you shouldn't use VRay and never again read its manual Use maxwell or fry as it much simplier. I hear only one or two instruments in my head, when using maxwell
I just can't seem to trust myself
So what chance does that leave, for anyone else?
---------------------------------------------------------
CG Artist
Comment