Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

In praise of progressive

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • In praise of progressive

    Just a quick note of thanks Vlado and the team, we find ourselves using progressive sampler more and more these days. Coupled with crazy fast xeon cpus, its a workflow made in heaven.

    Hoping for continued improvement of it.

    thanks!
    www.peterguthrie.net
    www.peterguthrie.net/blog/
    www.pg-skies.net/

  • #2
    For SP3 we will have proper sub-pixel filtering, so it means the progressive sampler will be able to produce 1:1 the results of the Adaptive sampler, even with sharpening AA filters.

    We are also looking into more efficient criteria for adaptive sampling; the one that we have right now has worked fine for 10+ years, but is a bit too conservative (i.e. in many cases shoots way more samples than strictly needed).

    Best regards,
    Vlado
    I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

    Comment


    • #3
      Wow, this will be awesome!
      Just hoping you still have the resume feature somewhere on the todo list
      3LP Team

      Comment


      • #4
        I haven't used it yet. What's the benefit? It's not faster, is it?
        Bobby Parker
        www.bobby-parker.com
        e-mail: info@bobby-parker.com
        phone: 2188206812

        My current hardware setup:
        • Ryzen 9 5900x CPU
        • 128gb Vengeance RGB Pro RAM
        • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 X2
        • ​Windows 11 Pro

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by glorybound View Post
          I haven't used it yet. What's the benefit? It's not faster, is it?
          It's progressive!

          Comment


          • #6
            Yes, but it'll still take just as long to get a clean render, correct? The difference is you can stop it before it's done and have something to show for it.
            Bobby Parker
            www.bobby-parker.com
            e-mail: info@bobby-parker.com
            phone: 2188206812

            My current hardware setup:
            • Ryzen 9 5900x CPU
            • 128gb Vengeance RGB Pro RAM
            • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 X2
            • ​Windows 11 Pro

            Comment


            • #7
              not any faster, just more convenient
              www.peterguthrie.net
              www.peterguthrie.net/blog/
              www.pg-skies.net/

              Comment


              • #8
                Actually, ATM, I find that it's slower than the DMC.
                Whatever render I'm doing, if I crop render and let render the DMC, and then switch to progressive and let it render for the same amount of time as the DMC, I always end up with a noisier result.

                Stan
                3LP Team

                Comment


                • #9
                  Some slowdown is unavoidable - keeping the image ready for display at any time takes some CPU cycles. There's quite some room for improvement though.

                  Best regards,
                  Vlado
                  I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'm cool to have it refreshing way less than "real-time"
                    once a minute, or even a option to disable the refresh and having a button "refresh" that would refresh only when pressed would be a good solution for me.

                    If that was the case and we put the refresh slowdown on the side, should we expect a 1:1 noise for 1:1 rendertime?

                    Thanks
                    3LP Team

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It's not purely a matter of display. V-Ray already has some logic to prevent updates from happening too often.

                      Best regards,
                      Vlado
                      I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X