Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bump2Normal?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bump2Normal?

    It's not working for me.

    The node just shows pink when I plug anything into it.

    Can someone show me an example of how you use it if it's even possible to use?

  • #2
    This shouldn't really bother you. Just plug the Bump2Normal into VrayNormalMap and then plug the VrayNormalMap into the Bump slot like in my screenshot. Hope this helps.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	bump2normal.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	99.0 KB
ID:	858264
    Aleksandar Mitov
    www.renarvisuals.com
    office@renarvisuals.com

    3ds Max 2023.2.2 + Vray 7 Hotfix 1
    AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-core
    96GB DDR5
    GeForce RTX 3090 24GB + GPU Driver 566.14

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks for the post Alex!!
      Cheers,
      -dave
      ■ ASUS ROG STRIX X399-E - 1950X ■ ASUS ROG STRIX X399-E - 2990WX ■ ASUS PRIME X399 - 2990WX ■ GIGABYTE AORUS X399 - 2990WX ■ ASUS Maximus Extreme XI with i9-9900k ■

      Comment


      • #4
        What's the point of doing bump mapping this way? Rather than plug the bitmap directly into the bump slot of the material?

        Best regards,
        Vlado
        I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

        Comment


        • #5
          I was under the impression that normal maps are rendered better than regular bump maps (especially in areas not lit directly by light). Is there really no point in converting regular grey bump maps into normal maps with this node? Or are there other uses for this node?

          Originally posted by vlado View Post
          What's the point of doing bump mapping this way? Rather than plug the bitmap directly into the bump slot of the material?

          Best regards,
          Vlado
          Aleksandar Mitov
          www.renarvisuals.com
          office@renarvisuals.com

          3ds Max 2023.2.2 + Vray 7 Hotfix 1
          AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-core
          96GB DDR5
          GeForce RTX 3090 24GB + GPU Driver 566.14

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Alex_M View Post
            I was under the impression that normal maps are rendered better than regular bump maps (especially in areas not lit directly by light).
            Yes, but only when the original bitmap is a normal map already. Otherwise it's just more calculations for a similar effect.

            Is there really no point in converting regular grey bump maps into normal maps with this node?
            The only minor difference is that with this approach the bump strength is specified as absolute "height" (i.e the normal that a displaced surface with the same displacement amount would have) whereas with regular bump maps, it varies with the local UV space stretching (i.e. the object size vs the UV space size), but that's a minor point I think.

            Or are there other uses for this node?
            The node was originally intended to allow users to derive normal maps for texture baking, or sometimes when you need to do something with the bump normal.

            Best regards,
            Vlado
            I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

            Comment


            • #7
              A really comprehensive reply, thanks. Makes things a whole lot more clear.
              Aleksandar Mitov
              www.renarvisuals.com
              office@renarvisuals.com

              3ds Max 2023.2.2 + Vray 7 Hotfix 1
              AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-core
              96GB DDR5
              GeForce RTX 3090 24GB + GPU Driver 566.14

              Comment


              • #8
                Thanks for the detailed explanation, Vlado.

                -Alan

                Comment


                • #9
                  this is a similar discussion to one i had in another thread.. i found converting a bump into a normal map using the nvidia tool, then using the resulting normal map in vray produced a much nicer bump effect, than just using the original bump map.

                  i was advised that this is the same as using the bump2normal to convert the bump into a normal map?

                  if this is the case then it -does- produce a nicer result than just plugging the bump map into the vray mtl.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X