If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Exciting News: Chaos acquires EvolveLAB = AI-Powered Design.
To learn more, please visit this page!
New! You can now log in to the forums with your chaos.com account as well as your forum account.
So I've seen this happen to my renders and wanted to figure it out myself. The issue looks like you are not creating enough GI samples to consistently reach underneath that tiny lip of the siding. Sometimes it samples the front, brighter face and the next samples underneath where it gets darker. As far as I understand it, Vray can't resolve the two without either taking more GI samples or smoothing out those samples. The 'right' solution in my mind is increasing your max rate samples to 0 from -1. You can enable those boxes by clicking where it says 'Medium' and selecting 'Custom'. This will increase your render times.
Smarter people than me on the forums may have a better answer. You could raise your interp. samples super high to artificially smooth out the difference in samples, but I'd not recommend it as it flattens the GI solution.
consider min max irmap samples as resolution of the irmap it self. If you want the resolution (precision or quality of gi map) to be high, to hold up to your image 1 to 1, set the max samples to 0, or 1 for fine areas.
in exterior settings though, you can get away with brute force with a lot less hassle.
hi Scott, your render looks nice
...like pkolbo_pop said, keep an eye on the subdivs too.
As you can see, not the min/max reduces the blotchynes, it makes it finer but not less...
Your subdivs are set by 40, thats realy too low. While increasing the subdivs, the blotchyness fades more and more out. It needs more pre-calculation time, but it´s the way...
I rendered the scene with the settings higher and the results where not that much better. One thing I noticed, the further the subject matter is away from the camera, the worse the condition.
One thing I noticed, the further the subject matter is away from the camera, the worse the condition.
This is because it's calculated on "screen units" rather than "world units", and is thus resolution dependant. Try brute force and see if you notice a significant difference in render times.
Brute force should fix it for you. I knew subdiv samples also solves this, but when I recreated that small model, 40 worked. Glad to know that I haven't been wasting my time setting those high.
Smalerbi, One other thought I had; how are you simulating the sky lighting? Is it the DefaultVraySky map that comes along with VRsun or an HDRI? I've seen HDRI's causing issues like this, although I'd expect to see more of it...
...I can speak only for maya...but thee is a big difference between using HDRIs per environment or per domelight!
Domelight works much better in case of blotchys...
there aren't many options for brute force, just turn it on. Its good for exteriors, gives you good quality with minimal problems. Only pitfall is it takes longer to render. How much longer is for you to do tests and compare.
Brute force should fix it for you. I knew subdiv samples also solves this, but when I recreated that small model, 40 worked. Glad to know that I haven't been wasting my time setting those high.
Smalerbi, One other thought I had; how are you simulating the sky lighting? Is it the DefaultVraySky map that comes along with VRsun or an HDRI? I've seen HDRI's causing issues like this, although I'd expect to see more of it...
With regards to Brute Force, I haven't had much experience or luck with it. I seem to get a lot of GI noise. I know it's because I have no idea what the settings need to be. Could you please share some BF settings to achieve the best results.
To answer the Sky question, it is the DefaultVRaySky map.
Comment