Thanks for all the great replies! I really like AutoCAD for its building-block-like simplicity. You draw a shape, extrude it, slice it, etc. This allows lots of freedom when modeling buildings. However, the part I find frustrating is the creation of things like doors, windows, etc. For example, whenever I want to create a window in AutoCAD, I have to subtract a box out of the wall, then create a series of several boxes for things like the trim, the frame, the glass itself, etc. While I can go through the commands for things like that pretty quickly, I wish there were a simpler way. I know AutoCAD Architectural Desktop has a window creation tool, but there are several drawbacks (it never seems to offer enough flexibility, plus the windows and doors created aren't solids-they're meshes).
Natty, I don't necessarily agree with you that modeling in a different software package is a waste of time. Perhaps it's because my 3ds Max modeling skills aren't the greatest, but the command line in AutoCAD allows me to flyyyy through the modeling process. The object snaps in AutoCAD also seem to work better than in 3ds Max. Do you use the object lines that you import from AutoCAD as shapes to extrude for the walls, or do you draw primitive shapes like boxes on top of the imported lines?
I noticed a couple of people mentioned ArchiCAD, which I have heard about before but have never had the opportunity to use. The only thing I worry about again is lack of flexibility. Sometimes parametric software packages are fast for fairly standard geometry, but then when it comes to creating custom shapes, they become more cumbersome than helpful.
Finally, there's Rhino. I've played around with Rhino a small amount. What I like about Rhino is that it has a command line (hopefully the user can modify the names of the commands like in AutoCAD). Rhino seems like a cross between AutoCAD and 3ds Max, and it can handle the creation of complex curves (unlike AutoCAD). I think I'll download a copy of Rhino and try it out to see how I like it...
Anyways, thanks for all of the input. Probably over the next month I'll be evaluating some of my options (AutoCAD 2005 Arch. Desktop, Rhino, ArchiCAD, and 3ds Max) to see how I could improve my workflow. More replies are welcome!
Natty, I don't necessarily agree with you that modeling in a different software package is a waste of time. Perhaps it's because my 3ds Max modeling skills aren't the greatest, but the command line in AutoCAD allows me to flyyyy through the modeling process. The object snaps in AutoCAD also seem to work better than in 3ds Max. Do you use the object lines that you import from AutoCAD as shapes to extrude for the walls, or do you draw primitive shapes like boxes on top of the imported lines?
I noticed a couple of people mentioned ArchiCAD, which I have heard about before but have never had the opportunity to use. The only thing I worry about again is lack of flexibility. Sometimes parametric software packages are fast for fairly standard geometry, but then when it comes to creating custom shapes, they become more cumbersome than helpful.
Finally, there's Rhino. I've played around with Rhino a small amount. What I like about Rhino is that it has a command line (hopefully the user can modify the names of the commands like in AutoCAD). Rhino seems like a cross between AutoCAD and 3ds Max, and it can handle the creation of complex curves (unlike AutoCAD). I think I'll download a copy of Rhino and try it out to see how I like it...
Anyways, thanks for all of the input. Probably over the next month I'll be evaluating some of my options (AutoCAD 2005 Arch. Desktop, Rhino, ArchiCAD, and 3ds Max) to see how I could improve my workflow. More replies are welcome!
Comment