Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Solid projection for procedural textures

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Solid projection for procedural textures

    Hello,
    I used Modo for rendering. There is a projection-type for the procedural TEXTURES named "Solid projection", very useful to me. There is something similar in Vray (no triplanar map), maybe only for some procedural textures?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture solid projection.JPG
Views:	383
Size:	43.4 KB
ID:	1133483Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture Vray  projection.JPG
Views:	274
Size:	31.5 KB
ID:	1133484

  • #2
    Hi lopez67,

    Some of the V-Ray procedural textures have three-dimensional coordinates and can be used in the described way.
    Here's the textures that do support 3D placement:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	3d textures.png
Views:	261
Size:	315.7 KB
ID:	1133883

    You can use each one of those and change the Texture Placement Type to 3D.

    Hope that helps,
    Konstantin

    Comment


    • #3
      Interesting. Could the material get a special mark, maybe (3D)?
      www.simulacrum.de ... visualization for designer and architects

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Micha View Post
        Interesting. Could the material get a special mark, maybe (3D)?
        You have a point here.
        We should indicate that these are 3D textures somehow - I'll log it.

        Konstantin

        Comment


        • #5
          This is great!
          To me, procedural textures and OSL textures are the future. With Substance or other similar software you can create your procedural material but then you need to bounce it to create 2d maps, so you need again texture them to apply to 3d objects as a regular 2d map. This is the past to me. With 3d procedural textures and osl, inside the rendering software, you don't need to map the 2d textures on the 3d object. The importance and utility of this are incredible.
          Roy

          Comment


          • #6
            Anyway, the only ones that works here are the two noise, the cellular and the smoke....the others don't work with the 3d world texture placement...

            Comment


            • #7
              Hi,

              You might have to change the texture Repeat parameter depending on your scene:
              Click image for larger version

Name:	3d procedural.png
Views:	241
Size:	538.7 KB
ID:	1134368

              Konstantin

              Comment


              • #8
                Hi Constantin,
                I'm desperately trying to create some realistic material in Vray for grasshopper bypassing the issue of UV mapping limitation. I'm trying now to use procedural textures, but if I scale non uniformly the projection, the texture doesn't follow the shape of creation (in this case some sweep along a rail). Any help?
                Thanks,
                Roy Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture UV mapping from grasshopper.PNG
Views:	169
Size:	550.1 KB
ID:	1142641

                Comment


                • #9
                  Hi Konstantin

                  Just a fast question what is the difference using 3d map ( object space) and 3d map ( world space).?


                  Thanks in advance

                  Nice question López67

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Any news?
                    thanks in advance

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Hi lopez67

                      I think the easiest thing here is to use a plugin for mapping. This will help in other instances as well.

                      Hi luisgamino2
                      Please check here https://docs.chaos.com/display/VRHIN...xturePlacement
                      There is additional info there that might help with other settings for placement

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        hmm...this was the only reply I was hoping not to receive...lol
                        do you have a suggestion for the plugin? do you think will you develop it as a command inside vray for grasshopper?
                        and anyway, the question is still the same: what's the difference between 3d object projection and 3d world projection? the manual doesn't answer it. why is the image I've posted above the projection doesn't follow the object if I'm using 3d object projection?
                        Vray for grasshopper is very underestimated and not much used until now but the future in my opinion. Impossible to stop grasshopper for architecture, lol.
                        Anyway, thanks,
                        Roy

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I didnt find any kind of information slavcho

                          I asked what is the difference using 3d map local space vs 3d map world space.

                          What do You mean with this in vray... what is local space and what is world space???

                          In the Docs. Chaos didnt explain anything about it

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Hi guys,

                            As for the screenshot posted by lopez67:
                            The 3D mapping you see is exactly what I'd expect.
                            There is no guarantee that the texture will be distorted in the direction you want.
                            The distortion is based on each object's local transformation.

                            I didnt find any kind of information slavcho
                            I asked what is the difference using 3d map local space vs 3d map world space.
                            What do You mean with this in vray... what is local space and what is world space???
                            In the Docs. Chaos didnt explain anything about it
                            Object space means that the 3D texture is going to be calculated in the local transformation space of each object.
                            This means that if you have mapped a cube and you later rotate and translate it, the texture will not change. It'll stick to the cube.
                            The World space mode will place the texture in global space meaning it will not stick to objects when they get transformed.
                            When you move objects around in this mode it will appear as if they are floating trough the three-dimentional texture.

                            Hope that makes sense,
                            Konstantin

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              konstantin_chaos Unfortunatly the Object Space isn't supported at Rhino, only we get World Space always. Is there a chance to get the Object Space working?

                              Workaround: tested and found – the object space works for objects within Rhino blocks.
                              www.simulacrum.de ... visualization for designer and architects

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X