I am relatively new to rendering so bear with me...
I have a new workstation with an Nvidia M4000 GPU. I don't use interactive render, I don't really find it useful, but I expected that the Nvidia CUDA GPU would perform faster and give better render results than using the Core i7 CPU for production renders. It seems I am wrong. This is the GPU render of a partially built scene:
Note the poor quality transparency of the tree (a 2D billboard) at the back.
This is the CPU render (no other settings changed)
The transparency is much better, oddly some colours have changed (palm tree left of centre is blue-green in GPU output, dark green in CPU output).
It seems I should have gone for a multiple CPU based machine, and not bothered too much about the GPU... expensive mistake?
I have a new workstation with an Nvidia M4000 GPU. I don't use interactive render, I don't really find it useful, but I expected that the Nvidia CUDA GPU would perform faster and give better render results than using the Core i7 CPU for production renders. It seems I am wrong. This is the GPU render of a partially built scene:
Note the poor quality transparency of the tree (a 2D billboard) at the back.
This is the CPU render (no other settings changed)
The transparency is much better, oddly some colours have changed (palm tree left of centre is blue-green in GPU output, dark green in CPU output).
It seems I should have gone for a multiple CPU based machine, and not bothered too much about the GPU... expensive mistake?
Comment