This is the Color Mapping tab's initial state when opening one file.
This is the same tab after rendering the file.
Which is the real explanation of the second bracket? What is it?
Why I ask it, see below
I found by changing the MULIPLIERr to 0.4545 I can mange to get the seemingly right looking image rather than tempering with the second value. But seems against what have been told in the Linear Workflow thread http://www.asgvis.com/index.php?opti...d=24&Itemid=57
It said in order to get the right Color Mapping, the second value "Inverse Gamma" should be set to 0.4545 to get the right result. Through some internet research I knew this move is to encode the image with a reverse Gamma in order that it can be displayed right in the Operating System, just the same as many file format had done, reverse Gamma encoded, for example JPG. But why change it will only make the image brighter which is against the suggested result in the "Linenar Workflow" thread?
Can someone be any help? Thanks!
This is the same tab after rendering the file.
Which is the real explanation of the second bracket? What is it?
Why I ask it, see below
I found by changing the MULIPLIERr to 0.4545 I can mange to get the seemingly right looking image rather than tempering with the second value. But seems against what have been told in the Linear Workflow thread http://www.asgvis.com/index.php?opti...d=24&Itemid=57
It said in order to get the right Color Mapping, the second value "Inverse Gamma" should be set to 0.4545 to get the right result. Through some internet research I knew this move is to encode the image with a reverse Gamma in order that it can be displayed right in the Operating System, just the same as many file format had done, reverse Gamma encoded, for example JPG. But why change it will only make the image brighter which is against the suggested result in the "Linenar Workflow" thread?
Can someone be any help? Thanks!
Comment