Hi,
I was testing V-Ray GPU in V-Ray 7 and noticed that it was considerably slower than the CPU engine in a simple scene (screenshots below). Almost 3 minutes with my RTX 3090 vs 1 minute with my 16-core Ryzen 9950x (overclocked to 5.25 Ghz). The results were the same with V-Ray 6, just ~5% slower in both cases. I made sure that the amount of noise is visually the same in both cases to make the test conditions fair. Therefore I had to set the noise threshold for the GPU engine to 0.008 and 0.005 for the CPU engine respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b3c5/8b3c5657e8a1dfe480e4bf6e283c988ac8bd7bf8" alt="Click image for larger version Name: v-ray_cpu.jpg Views: 28 Size: 421.2 KB ID: 1219777"
This can't be normal, can it? I was under the impression that RTX 3090 was decently faster than most CPUs, including the 32-core Threadripper 3970x, as reported on a few occasions by Muhammed_Hamed , if I remember correctly.
My V-Ray benchmark CUDA score seems to in line with most other people's scores, so my GPU seems to be working fine.
I was testing V-Ray GPU in V-Ray 7 and noticed that it was considerably slower than the CPU engine in a simple scene (screenshots below). Almost 3 minutes with my RTX 3090 vs 1 minute with my 16-core Ryzen 9950x (overclocked to 5.25 Ghz). The results were the same with V-Ray 6, just ~5% slower in both cases. I made sure that the amount of noise is visually the same in both cases to make the test conditions fair. Therefore I had to set the noise threshold for the GPU engine to 0.008 and 0.005 for the CPU engine respectively.
This can't be normal, can it? I was under the impression that RTX 3090 was decently faster than most CPUs, including the 32-core Threadripper 3970x, as reported on a few occasions by Muhammed_Hamed , if I remember correctly.
My V-Ray benchmark CUDA score seems to in line with most other people's scores, so my GPU seems to be working fine.
Comment