+1 for ortho views. Since Enscape is generally geared towards archviz, this is a pretty critical item in the workflow.
+1 as well
+1 aqui
Thank you all for the feedback, your votes will be added to the topic! 
@LiTeL , we’ll check what’s feasible, thanks for the feedback - be assured that generally every vote/voice will be taken into account, be it via tickets, forum, or any other sources (exhibitions, social media, etc.).
I’ll add my vote to the list here.
+1 Ortho would be very useful
@AugustR and @Vincent_2 , +2 for the topic, thank you.
Another vote from our office - orthographic projects would open up all sorts of possibilities for creating diagrams… please make it a top priority
:thumbup: yes, all this would be great options , but: All this would be possible out of the box, if Enscape would be able to map 1 to 1 what our main cad application is pretending. Of course, this also includes the 2-point perspective: Here also: Not the Enscape-own version, but of course only the one that our CAD application already supplies. So enscape itself does not have to be able to do that alone, because our CAD can do all that already and better. Enscape should render it only 
Hi Egie
your application may support all this options but mine does not:)
so i would love Enscape to give me this options.
If you have a look some of this interesting projection would not be in the remit of an Documentation Application
Hi Michael Ruehr, thanks for your objection which is completely correct :thumbup: (I had mistakenly assumed Revit contains these settings by default).
So I remain at least in the hope that Enscape will improve the view(-port) connectivity where the main CAD applications already determine these settings
By the way - your iso overview above is great :thumbup: :thumbup:
Yes please! People have been requesting this feature for a long time. It would be extremely helpful
This is a major downside for me for Enscape as well- and it has been on the request list for a while. It may not be easy to implement, but would really make a big difference for architects!!!
Please count this vote as well from our office, being able to export orthogonal elevations is a very much needed feature! Thanks
Last I rendered ISO views per long tele lens at Rhino and I got artefacts at transparent surfaces. Quite bad during a project with tight deadline.
Thank you very much for all the additional feedback. Your up-votes will be taken into account of course.
@Micha , maybe you can also share a screenshot of these artifacts you’re experiencing?
Let me chime in on this one.
+1 please
+1
Recently obtained this software and absolutely loving it!
The more I explore it, the more possibilities are opened.
Then I approached the issue of ‘Parallel / Axonometric / Orthographic Projection’.
So I’d also like to +1 this feature
[can’t imagine the insane algorithmic complexity involved in trying to implement this feature, so a definite kudos to the Team, come the day it’s rolled out]