Hello, I’ve been working on improving VRay’s GI algorithms lately (among many other things); here are some interesting results. Calculation of GI for the first image is 1 minute 26 seconds, and for the second one - about 4 minutes (on Athlon 1800+, NOT multithreaded at the moment). There are no lights in the scene, just pure skylight…
good to hear, that the GI algorithms are also in progress.
i’m wondering how the rendertimes were improved against the actual version of vray. is it a matter of speed that was improved or another aspect, i.e. more accurate light solution…
It probably cannot be directly compared since no lights other than skylight is involved as vlado stated but still quite fast, especially considering that there was no multithreading enabled.
Machine specs are the same (Athlon 1800)
For me I return on max 5 because I loose too much time in rendering
on max6 with vray.
But I do like Vray that one day will be a reference, I’m sure of it.
tony: lighting an interior scene from just skylight will always look kinda noise unless your willing to wait forever. but it looks better then what ive seen in the past. keep it up vlado!
2percydaman: i know that
don’t get me wrong i realize that it’s just a test and i wasn’t trying to discourage Vlado from trying new things
i’m all up for it just like most ppl here
the key word in my post was “practical”
it’s great that it only took 4 minutes
but does it look like a finished rendering worth showing to a client?
while the point was- if the “new” stuff works how long would it take to get the same scene to look finished?
i think the first one is actually better than the sec. one…even tho it takes less time (which is a good thing )…i am not gonna explain in full detail why i think its better cuz i am runnin out of time…generally the first one is more realistic… :lol:
I just loose time in rendering under max6 because there is no
distribution rendering implemented yet in Vray.
So on large images it’s too much long to compute…
DR works on max5 so, I have no choice, I must stay on max5.
I work a lot in architecture and max6 is better for me to achieve
some projects.Nevertheless I can do the same in max5 but it’s a bit
longer to prepare.
Hello Vlado
I am user of VRAY and I am very glad to see some new GI improvement of VRAY(I am suprised because of it’s velocity).
However several months ago I posted with some other users of the forum, that we need to be able to output layers more easily(a gi output like FR, or an ambient occlusion pass, a reflection pass , a z-buffer pass,…) http://www.chaoticdimension.com/forums/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2409
but I did not see any update. I am sorry but the vray G-buffer slot didn’t help me a lot
Then I would like to know if you intend to take into account our needs or if you set up the heading “wishlist” on your forum just to decorate
Hello Vlado
I am user of VRAY and I am very glad to see some new GI improvement of VRAY(I am suprised because of it’s velocity).
However several months ago I posted with some other users of the forum, that we need to be able to output layers more easily(a gi output like FR, or an ambient occlusion pass, a reflection pass , a z-buffer pass,…) http://www.chaoticdimension.com/forums/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2409
but I did not see any update. I am sorry but the vray G-buffer slot didn’t help me a lot
Then I would like to know if you intend to take into account our needs or if you set up the heading “wishlist” on your forum just to decorate
thank you to answer me
ps:sorry for my englishYep, working on that too. It doesn’t look very impressive to post though… Also, as far as I remember, faster and better GI is also in the wishlist.