Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

thumb drive+flash render

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • thumb drive+flash render

    here's the model i create to explain something about polymodeling to one of my friend......so i kinda combine it with the popular "flashlightlook" render by using one max target spotlight..




    Here's the kingstone data traveler original img my friend provide me...

  • #2
    why do i get the impression ive seen this before ?

    ---------------------------------------------------
    MSN addresses are not for newbies or warez users to contact the pros and bug them with
    stupid questions the forum can answer.

    Comment


    • #3
      I'd like to point out that I think people are getting caught up in a translation error.

      When the Maxwell people started posting images like this, they were trying to mimick the effect of a camera flash, not a flashlight (in British English this is called an electric torch or lantern). I hope this aleviates people's confusion, because the renders that are showing up now look good, but don't look like a flashlight or a camera flash.

      Comment


      • #4
        sorry about my poor english

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by ad-max
          sorry about my poor english
          Its not your poor English, and I wasn't directing it specifically at you. I'm just noticing that on all these "flashlight" renders that are popping up right now, they don't look like a "flashlight" or a "camera flash" and I think its because of the confusion in terms.

          Comment


          • #6
            Looks like it's lit by a flash to me.

            --Jon

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Trapezium
              Looks like it's lit by a flash to me.

              --Jon
              Not really, you would never be able to take a flash picture at this proximity to an object. I think also that the Maxwell flash photos are in fact much more accurate since they have real light intensity and real camera settings. BTW, cheapo flash photos are usually not considered good in the real world of photography.

              Comment


              • #8
                BTW, cheapo flash photos are usually not considered good in the real world of photography.
                geez ya think?
                ____________________________________

                "Sometimes life leaves a hundred dollar bill on your dresser, and you don't realize until later that it's because it fu**ed you."

                Comment


                • #9
                  With that intense of light the reflections in the table should be much stronger.

                  Not really, you would never be able to take a flash picture at this proximity to an object
                  Of course you can Macro works great with zoom Though it wouldn't falloff that quick in such a small space.

                  geez ya think?
                  smartazz :P

                  --Jon

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Trapezium
                    Though it wouldn't falloff that quick in such a small space.
                    that is what I mean... the photo would be pretty much solid white.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Doesn't the chap mean 'flash-drive' - ie solid state memory?
                      Kind Regards,
                      Richard Birket
                      ----------------------------------->
                      http://www.blinkimage.com

                      ----------------------------------->

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Oh, sorry, no he doesn't. I've just re-read the post.
                        Kind Regards,
                        Richard Birket
                        ----------------------------------->
                        http://www.blinkimage.com

                        ----------------------------------->

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by cpnichols
                          Originally posted by Trapezium
                          Though it wouldn't falloff that quick in such a small space.
                          that is what I mean... the photo would be pretty much solid white.
                          Well, you could of course use a macro ring-flash, though that would give a different (and more esthetically pleasing) look.
                          Torgeir Holm | www.netronfilm.com

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            wow everyone seems to be so worked up over something or other. Is there thread you guys are referring to that you can link us to so that people such as myself know what the hell you are all on about? :P

                            Looks like nice images to me...

                            is this flash light method supposed to look like a torch light or camera flash? either way I think these are good images and dont know what you all seem so offended about. The only thing that gets me is how dark the shadows are but if we are talking about a bright light source then this is the kind of effect right?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              It all got inspired by this thread on cgtalk where a maxwell user posted some spectacular images that recreate the look of 'ordinary' photography with a flash. Somehow with various translation errors, people in this forum have come to take it to mean "flashlight" (aka torch). In that regards, I don't think they have been sucessfull renders, although in other respects, such as the modeling on the images in this thread, they are very good. But in recreating a camera flash, quite a few have missed the mark I think.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X