If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Exciting News: Chaos acquires EvolveLAB = AI-Powered Design.
To learn more, please visit this page!
New! You can now log in to the forums with your chaos.com account as well as your forum account.
The architects feedback was to bring the sun behind the camera so everything is on light... ugh! it will give me an opportunity to play with the foreground shadows.
yes, it actually looks good! I wouldn't have said that for the first version. But I beg you, crop the view and remove those useless cars in the foreground
The architects feedback was to bring the sun behind the camera so everything is on light... ugh! it will give me an opportunity to play with the foreground shadows.
The architect has no clue, I can tell you right away, it will be really bad with the sun behind the camera!
seriously though, speaking as an architect who moved to visualisation, it never does any harm to politely remind your client that you are the one with the expertise in knowing where to position the sun.
In my experience the most problematic area is in composition, the architect always wants to show more than is needed!
hello,
I think the roads need more work adding lines.....the car in the frontground looks like is driving fast inside the parking lot...even if you have to fake it, I would put a curb on the botton left corner to have a sense of direcccion
maybe different asphalt color would improve the image.
Here is an update. I am not sure it's going to move anyone, but it is what the architect asked for. Anything that would help make the image better would be appreciated.
It looks better!! I think the grass is too dark, the big tree in the middle doesn't look right.... Usually, between roads with that width, it should be something in the range of 10' to 15' height.
Comment