Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

XEON vs. i7 again - TESTING INTERIOR SCENE

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Time: 1 min. 4s.
    CPU: E5-2670v3 x 2 @ stock
    Vray: 3,10.03
    MAX: 2014
    Win8.1Pro
    Embree ON
    Alex York
    Founder of Atelier York - Bespoke Architectural Visualisation
    www.atelieryork.co.uk

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by tricky View Post
      Our latest couple of machines have been XEON based and we are very happy with them. However, we are considering getting a couple of overclocked (professionally - not by me!) 8-core i7 based machines. From this thread, it seems they are good value, but in terms of stability, assuming the machine is built well, how to they compare with XEONs?
      If they've done the OC properly, they will be rock-solid. I suggest OCUK for this. Scan's CS is poor, even if they're a bit cheaper. An overclocked bundle or full system is probably the way to go.
      Alex York
      Founder of Atelier York - Bespoke Architectural Visualisation
      www.atelieryork.co.uk

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by werticus View Post
        twin 1366 6core xeons at 3.2ghz + 3 generation old i7 (4 core) at 3.4ghz and another 2 gen old i7 (6 core) at 4.4ghz in DR and it gets 1min 55seconds which is a fair bit slower than the current 8 core i7 at 4.4ghz gets on its own. Probably uses about 4x the electricity too.
        @werticus
        I am afraid this scene is pretty bad field of testing DR rendering. Loading the scene + LC takes far too much for comparison: few machines in DR vs. single machine.

        Another matter is a comaparison: new i7 (2011v3) vs. dula xeon (1366)
        My SR-2 machine with dual xeon performs pretty much the same as i7 5960x (when it comes a renderings time) and SR-2 cost me just a little bit less then i7 5960x. So I can agree there is no point of buying an SR-2 now.

        However it is completely another story when it comes to the render slaves.
        I just bought recently few HP z800 (dual xeon x5670) and the rendering time is the same as i7 5820k. But hp z800 are much, much cheaper.
        Similar configuration machines (32GB RAM, SSD 128 GB):
        PC with i7 5820x - 1420 US $
        used hp z800 - 850 US $

        So I have no doubt that buying an old hp z800 with dual xeons s5670 for a render slave is the best deal you can make at the moment.
        i-9 7980XE at stock, G. Skill RipjawsV 64GB RED, MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING X 11GB, http://fractalmind.eu

        Comment


        • #94
          I understand,
          What's the power consumption of a dual xeon compared to a single cpu.
          I wonder if on the long run you're still winning, I guess it all depends on how much you're using it. 24/7 or a few hours a day
          3LP Team

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by 3LP View Post
            I understand,
            What's the power consumption of a dual xeon compared to a single cpu.
            I wonder if on the long run you're still winning, I guess it all depends on how much you're using it. 24/7 or a few hours a day
            To be more precise: I compared dual xeon x5670 (no OC) with i7 5280K OC at 4,2 GHz.
            Power consumtion (while rendering - full loaded):
            dual xeon x5670 (hp z800) - 385W-400W vs. i7 5820K - 330W

            So the difference is 55W-70W.
            Last edited by baastyan; 01-04-2015, 04:06 PM.
            i-9 7980XE at stock, G. Skill RipjawsV 64GB RED, MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING X 11GB, http://fractalmind.eu

            Comment


            • #96
              I just discovered this thread, I love it so I decided to test my rig:

              Asus Sabertooth x79
              4930k (6-core) @ 4.2ghz
              32 GB Ram
              V-Ray 3.10.03
              3ds Max 2015

              2.50s No Embree

              2.35s Embree On

              I then looked at the settings further and noticed "use glossy rays" wasn't enabled, any particular reason you left this off? I always keep this on for faster renders. Anyways, I enabled it and got this:

              1.18s

              Woot!
              Last edited by S_K_I; 02-04-2015, 07:37 PM.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by S_K_I View Post

                I then looked at the settings further and noticed "use glossy rays" wasn't enabled, any particular reason you left this off? I always keep this on for faster renders. Anyways, I enabled it and got this:

                1.18s

                Woot!
                Thanks for sharing your test!
                Regarding the "use glossy rays". This scene is not meant to be optimized. It is meant to be left as it is so you can compare the performance of many different CPUs.
                The only exception is EMBREE option.
                i-9 7980XE at stock, G. Skill RipjawsV 64GB RED, MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING X 11GB, http://fractalmind.eu

                Comment


                • #98
                  Dell Precision T7500 (new in May 2009)

                  Dual Xeon E5504 2.0 GHz (Nehalem)
                  16 GB RAM
                  V-Ray 3.10.03
                  3ds Max 2015

                  Render Time: 6:48

                  Any idea what Dual Xeon X5690 processors do in the same system?

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Dual Xeon X5690 3.46 GHz
                    24 GB RAM
                    V-Ray 3.10.03
                    3ds Max 2015

                    Render Time: 1:53
                    Resolution Digital
                    www.resolutiondigital.co.uk

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by alexyork View Post
                      If they've done the OC properly, they will be rock-solid. I suggest OCUK for this. Scan's CS is poor, even if they're a bit cheaper. An overclocked bundle or full system is probably the way to go.
                      Thanks Alex.
                      Kind Regards,
                      Richard Birket
                      ----------------------------------->
                      http://www.blinkimage.com

                      ----------------------------------->

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Resolution01 View Post
                        Dual Xeon X5690 3.46 GHz
                        24 GB RAM
                        V-Ray 3.10.03
                        3ds Max 2015

                        Render Time: 1:53
                        Resolution01: Was this a T7500 system?

                        Comment


                        • Yes it is a T7500.
                          Resolution Digital
                          www.resolutiondigital.co.uk

                          Comment


                          • Dual Xeon X5690 3.46 GHz
                            24 GB RAM
                            V-Ray 3.10.03
                            3ds Max 2015

                            Render Time: 2:39 (Hyper-Threading Off, Use Embree Unchecked - NUMA in BIOS)
                            Render Time: 2:04 (Hyper-Threading On, Use Embree Unchecked - NUMA in BIOS)
                            Render Time: 2:03 (Hyper-Threading On, Use Embree Unchecked - SMP in BIOS)
                            Render Time: 2:01 (Hyper-Threading On, Use Embree Checked - NUMA in BIOS)
                            Render Time: 1:53 (Hyper-Threading On, Use Embree Checked - SMP in BIOS)
                            Last edited by Tim in Hollywood; 20-04-2015, 09:15 PM.

                            Comment


                            • So, SMP is better than NUMA - somewhat expected, but it's good to have confirmation

                              Best regards,
                              Vlado
                              I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

                              Comment


                              • Dual Xeon E5-2650 V3 (2,3 Ghz) DELL 7810
                                32 GB RAM
                                Vray 3.10.03
                                3ds max 2014

                                Time: 1:10,7 min (embree On)
                                TIme: 1:16,9 min (embree Off)
                                www.vis-art.de
                                www.facebook.com/visart3d

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X