If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Exciting News: Chaos acquires EvolveLAB = AI-Powered Design.
To learn more, please visit this page!
New! You can now log in to the forums with your chaos.com account as well as your forum account.
ok thats just too funny for words. so ill use an image (with words)
hehe. it really does. but hey. in their defence its still an alpha (or beta i forget) renderer.
---------------------------------------------------
MSN addresses are not for newbies or warez users to contact the pros and bug them with
stupid questions the forum can answer.
Guys guys... Maxwell did not make that render. The artist did. He/she decided that 1- Maxwell was the right tool, 2- 345 hours was worth the wait, that is his/her choice. I can easily make a render in Vray that lasts 345 hours. BTW. 345 hours is 10 days. And 345 hours at lets say $30/hour is around $10k. Would it be worth it? Question is, can you make a render in Maxwell that is 20 mins? I am sure you can.... maybe not now, but some day.
I dont think we're doing ourselves much justice when we poke fun at other renderers. Ive seen chris defend vray and its methods to alot of hardnose, stubborn renderman types.
And while I agree the render might not be all that and a cupcake, and vray could have done the same thing in 20 minutes, I hope we can be above raggin on others.
Ive been critical of maxwell in the past, but you have to remember, your not just beating on maxwell, but this guys hard work.
____________________________________
"Sometimes life leaves a hundred dollar bill on your dresser, and you don't realize until later that it's because it fu**ed you."
Well said Percy... and the truth is that, regardless of the rendertimes, it is undeniable that Maxwell is creating waves. We may not have PPT and the new Physical Sky in Vray if it was not for Maxwell. So we can thank them for that.
Maxwell is a great tool, I'm wating for the final release....there are amazing images...very realistic ones, but it's one more tool as Vray.
Maxwell in some cases is not slow if you compare with the quality...using the maximun quality in Vray also takes for ever....the beauty of Vray is that one has options
---------------------------------------------------
MSN addresses are not for newbies or warez users to contact the pros and bug them with
stupid questions the forum can answer.
lol i suppose his math might be a tad off. And I didn't know it was standard to charge clients strictly for rendertime. But I dont think that was his main point.
____________________________________
"Sometimes life leaves a hundred dollar bill on your dresser, and you don't realize until later that it's because it fu**ed you."
lets not start another thread about how vray is better then maxwell...its all been said before:
its not the tool its the artist who uses it.
well said!
many ppl here use more than 1 render software..
we've all seen bad images in all rendering engines
*phew* glad there still isn't an 'automatic render' button
Comment