Now on CGTalk under the announcement of vray 1.5, a user registered here too, with a grand total of one post in the FREE section, uploaded an image done with 1.49.77 to show the fast SSS.
While the user's here, i reckon he's got no access whatsoever to the core of the forum, as he rendered a purely QMC image with an adaptive AA, and arbitrary sampling for the QMC based effects.
Of the two one, say i: he either discovered something about the vray usage we do not know, or he's a warez monkey.
Or maybe i am again just ranting at the wind, and he is a registered betatester wich knows nothing of the vray's workflow (showing us how much better the adaptive AA got with the newer releases?), or a registered betatester which makes personal decisions quite opposite to the ones i'd make, in which case i'd like to hear his reasons, as i might learn something deeply new and disconcerting.
End of rant.
Lele
While the user's here, i reckon he's got no access whatsoever to the core of the forum, as he rendered a purely QMC image with an adaptive AA, and arbitrary sampling for the QMC based effects.
Of the two one, say i: he either discovered something about the vray usage we do not know, or he's a warez monkey.
Or maybe i am again just ranting at the wind, and he is a registered betatester wich knows nothing of the vray's workflow (showing us how much better the adaptive AA got with the newer releases?), or a registered betatester which makes personal decisions quite opposite to the ones i'd make, in which case i'd like to hear his reasons, as i might learn something deeply new and disconcerting.
End of rant.
Lele
Comment