If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
New! You can now log in to the forums with your chaos.com account as well as your forum account.
xeon x5365 is about 15-20% faster, but eats a lot more energy.
the purpose of a ninja is to flip out and kill people.
the purpose of an architect is to flip out and design for people.
________________________ www.1050.pl / www.kinetik.pl
It says different here.
On same Mhz, the Barcelona should be 20% faster.
Then again, by the time the 3Ghz is out, intel will have a newer chip released, purportedly faster.
The good news for the likes of me is that a BIOS update will allow my pc to go from 2 to 4 cores.
It says different here.
On same Mhz, the Barcelona should be 20% faster.
Then again, by the time the 3Ghz is out, intel will have a newer chip released, purportedly faster.
The good news for the likes of me is that a BIOS update will allow my pc to go from 2 to 4 cores.
It says the Barcelona is 20% faster than the old Opterons, not the Xeons.
Still it says it's around about the 2ghz Xeons, or just slightly slower.
I'm running an asus m2n32 sli deluxe, with am2 socket.
Of course i'll have to wait until single socket chips are out =]
edit: in the software rendering, though, the strength of the AMD integrated memory controller does shine: 2X2 (2.33 Ghz) from intel is slower than the AMD quad-core @2.0 Ghz
Are people still excited about a 2.0ghz processor? My £170 Q6600 is running at 3ghz and the new G0 stepping revision can be overclocked as far as 3.6ghz.
I just don't see anything exciting in AMDs product lines. The 20% increase in speed clock for clock is paltry when you take price into account. Intel now seriously has a chip for everyone and at price points it is hard to see AMD matching with a brand new product.
Talk of this Core2 competitior the tri-core phenom just shows to me that even with this new phenom range AMD is crapping them selves that it is not enough.
Are people still excited about a 2.0ghz processor? My £170 Q6600 is running at 3ghz and the new G0 stepping revision can be overclocked as far as 3.6ghz.
Are people still excited at the MhZ race?
"Mine is bigger than yours" kind of thing?
I prefer a proper design as the AMD processors have, with integrated memory controller and an elegant one-speed-fits-it-all design, than the myriad of clocks in the intel designs, to be honest.
It also shows in some benchmarks, when they're done properly, that the memory access in AMDs is way better than that of Intels, more than making up for the clock "deficit".
And as stated above, i'll more than double my actual performance with as little as the price of their 4-core cpu and a BIOS update.
Now THAT excites me, ta very much.
Well personally I would take the cheapest fastest available.
If that means its the bastardised welded together carbunkle thats fine by me!
Proper multi-core design and the worlds best integrated memory controller mean fook all if the other 'messy' older generation chip is rendering twice as quickly at the same price point.
I read today about the up and coming Intel 'Nehalem' cpus which will also have a similar integrated memory controller that barcelona sport and they will be out within the next 12 months. It just feels that Intel has wave after wave of updates that will destroy anything which AMD brings out.
I honestly was hoping that AMD would bring the goods to the table and I have 4x rendernodes crying out for a quad core solution, but from everything I have read I just don't see it happening.
---------------------------------------------------
MSN addresses are not for newbies or warez users to contact the pros and bug them with
stupid questions the forum can answer.
I mentioned that tri-core in my previous post. Sounds like their dual cores can't compete with the Intel dual cores.
But if you can have 3 cores why not have 4!
Silly move on AMDs part I feel.
Just spotted on a webpage a brief note of what Otellini from Intel said today:
"Otellini took the chance to have another swipe at AMD in the session when someone asked a question about 'Intel's nearest competitor,' and was clearly talking about AMD, but Otellini replied: 'Who? IBM?'"
Comment