hmmm...could be. i didn't know there was such a speed difference in these fairly minor version changes.... I might take a look at my motherboard and see if theres any bios updates for it.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Benchmarking - how 'bout a new round...
Collapse
X
-
A short note on the MHz: V-Ray tries to determine the MHz itself, so the data you see in the frame stamp is measured, and not taken from the system info - which is why you may see differences.
Best regards,
VladoI only act like I know everything, Rogers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DaForceWhen will the 64bit version of vray become publically availble? im curious to see if it makes any difference.
And its it part of the vrayexe project, as in can it run independat of max which i believe is still 32bit bound?
Best regards,
VladoI only act like I know everything, Rogers.
Comment
-
I had a go on the Dual 2.8 Xeon I use here which seemed to go fairly well to my surprise. Could be due to the version?:
BTW: this is a Dell Precision 670 and I netrendered it....which may explain the difference? (the computer wasnt used while rendering)
IF a plain old lower end dual core can get close/better its definatly a decent cheaper alternative for a renderfarm.
PS: percy your machine should be down around 1h or under. Thats really weird stuff. Let us know when you sort it out and have fun with rendering twice as fast when you do ) check your other other appz running/ try a netrender/check HT is enabled in bios/ do a clean format etc
Comment
Comment