Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LC camera path glossy rays question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LC camera path glossy rays question

    When using the light cache set to camera path, can we still use it to calculate glossy rays, or will it not work?

    I notice in the rendering an anim II tutorial (http://www.spot3d.com/vray/help/200R...ials_anim2.htm) it tells you to turn off the secondary bounces GI when doing the actual rendering.
    www.peterguthrie.net
    www.peterguthrie.net/blog/
    www.pg-skies.net/

  • #2
    I think this is because it will already be "baked" into the IR Map - sort of from the calc phase?
    Kind Regards,
    Morne

    Comment


    • #3
      yeah thats my understanding, i was just wondering if you can tick the glossy rays box and then load it from file when doing the final rendering.
      www.peterguthrie.net
      www.peterguthrie.net/blog/
      www.pg-skies.net/

      Comment


      • #4
        I understand it that you won't have to tick the box or use it AT ALL with the final rendering. Asif the Lightcache and glossy rays was saved/combined into the IR map with the calc in phase1 and not seperate as we would do it traditionally - I think?
        Last edited by Morne; 29-11-2010, 05:32 AM. Reason: rephrased
        Kind Regards,
        Morne

        Comment


        • #5
          ah ok, wasnt sure if glossy rays could be saved into the irradiance map, i guess i better do some tests then...
          www.peterguthrie.net
          www.peterguthrie.net/blog/
          www.pg-skies.net/

          Comment


          • #6
            far as I know glossy rays are not saved into the irr map though being not exactly technically minded I could be wrong..

            I have done several animations where the light cache was 'burned' into the irradiance map during the pre-calc and then secondary bounces set to none for the final output and I always uncheck 'use LC for glossy rays' and so far they've all come out fine. If you do have a scene with a lot off glossy surfaces and you need to speed up the rendering I'd set primary to irr map (multiframe inc every 10th frame or so), secondary to LC in 'Fly through mode' and turn on 'Use LC for glossy rays' and save out seperate .vrmap and a .vrlmap for use in rendering the final frames. This way the light cache can be used to accelerate glossies.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Pictor2 View Post
              far as I know glossy rays are not saved into the irr map though being not exactly technically minded I could be wrong..

              I have done several animations where the light cache was 'burned' into the irradiance map during the pre-calc and then secondary bounces set to none for the final output and I always uncheck 'use LC for glossy rays' and so far they've all come out fine. If you do have a scene with a lot off glossy surfaces and you need to speed up the rendering I'd set primary to irr map (multiframe inc every 10th frame or so), secondary to LC in 'Fly through mode' and turn on 'Use LC for glossy rays' and save out seperate .vrmap and a .vrlmap for use in rendering the final frames. This way the light cache can be used to accelerate glossies.
              Yes but Peter was referring to the "New tutorial" where you do a IR Map precalc and light cache calc for EACH FRAME in "precalc" mode for phase1 and then just use the IR Map for phase2 which is the actual rendering
              Kind Regards,
              Morne

              Comment


              • #8
                I'm trying to do a short clip where the camera moves forward slowly and the lighting changes.
                www.peterguthrie.net
                www.peterguthrie.net/blog/
                www.pg-skies.net/

                Comment


                • #9
                  ah righto, sorry. Similar principle though surely? If you've got 'use light cache for glossy rays' checked you will need to save the LC from phase one and load it into the secondary bounce for phase 2 so vray has something to calculate glossies from? Switching secondary to 'none' surely won't work when using LC for glossies, far as I know glossy rays are not stored in the irr map. Might be different of course for this newfangled camera path option but doesn't seem to be mentioned in the tutorial.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    then I'm kind of back to my original question

                    The tutorial I linked to above seems to me to be the best approach for the clip I want to render, but can I modify the workflow so that the LC helps with the glossy rays?, as without it it seems very slow.

                    OR, should I just stick with Brute force and LC and accept the long render times?
                    www.peterguthrie.net
                    www.peterguthrie.net/blog/
                    www.pg-skies.net/

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      If you plan to enable the "Use light cache for glossy rays" option, then you need the light cache for the final rendering. That means that, for animations with moving objects, you'd have to keep the light cache to "single frame" mode along with the "Use camera path" option enabled.

                      If the "Use light cache for glossy rays" option is disabled, then you can turn off secondary bounces altogether.

                      Best regards,
                      Vlado
                      I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by vlado View Post
                        If you plan to enable the "Use light cache for glossy rays" option, then you need the light cache for the final rendering. That means that, for animations with moving objects, you'd have to keep the light cache to "single frame" mode along with the "Use camera path" option enabled.

                        If the "Use light cache for glossy rays" option is disabled, then you can turn off secondary bounces altogether.

                        Best regards,
                        Vlado
                        That's something that SHOULD be added into that tutorial and ALSO in the documentation
                        Kind Regards,
                        Morne

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by vlado View Post
                          If you plan to enable the "Use light cache for glossy rays" option, then you need the light cache for the final rendering. That means that, for animations with moving objects, you'd have to keep the light cache to "single frame" mode along with the "Use camera path" option enabled.

                          If the "Use light cache for glossy rays" option is disabled, then you can turn off secondary bounces altogether.

                          Best regards,
                          Vlado
                          Thanks Vlado, thats what I needed to know.
                          www.peterguthrie.net
                          www.peterguthrie.net/blog/
                          www.pg-skies.net/

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            And can a precalculated lightcache (one single frame with 'Use camera path') be used for glossy rays in a scene without moving objects then? Or does the lightcache always need to be calculated on single frame for each frame to use that?

                            Does the option have to be enabled both during precalc and rendering?
                            3DV - Ruud van Reenen
                            www.3dv.nl

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by ruud3dv View Post
                              And can a precalculated lightcache (one single frame with 'Use camera path') be used for glossy rays in a scene without moving objects then?
                              Yes.

                              Does the option have to be enabled both during precalc and rendering?
                              It shouldn't matter, but just for consistency it's probably best to keep it the same.

                              Best regards,
                              Vlado
                              I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X