Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ice material...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Were you scattering objects on a surface for this or is it a volume / continuous surface? Looks great!

    Comment


    • #17
      Bit of both: it's a noised-up surface but then some displacement and on top of that I scattered some crystals with Forest Pack Pro
      Brett Simms

      www.heavyartillery.com
      e: brett@heavyartillery.com

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by simmsimaging View Post
        Looks pretty good! How far did you push the refraction glossiness? I think you can get that depth in the ice with more glossy refractions. It will help the translucency too IMO.

        Caustics would be good, but I'm not having much luck getting good caustics on such small refined shapes.
        sorry to get back so late, but was rendering and couldn't enter settings.
        here's how mat looks like

        also a bit of bump
        Luke Szeflinski
        :: www.lukx.com cgi

        Comment


        • #19
          Brett awesome results. I tried your way with forest and crystals but I had to render 3000x40000 res and just one bucket when on ice part was taking 10 minutes to render !!! So I passed
          Luke Szeflinski
          :: www.lukx.com cgi

          Comment


          • #20
            Your mat looks good. I think .99 glossiness isn't enough to give you that translucent look though. I used a much lower glossy value and it does much of the translucent effect, but renders fast IMO. FPP/scattering to do *all* the crystals was super slow - I gave up too. I just used it to add 500-600 crystals on top of the displacement/bump effect and it adds that nice bit of detail but wasn't too bad to render at all.

            Brett Simms

            www.heavyartillery.com
            e: brett@heavyartillery.com

            Comment


            • #21
              yeah at first few draft that I showed the client I used aroudn the value you have for refraction glossiness and got the comment form client that it looks like gel not ice
              so you know ... we got to keep client happy
              Luke Szeflinski
              :: www.lukx.com cgi

              Comment


              • #22
                I hear you Yours looks very good, no question - I think I mostly avoid SSS type stuff because I love using VrayRT for lighting and material development and tend to not use stuff that still doesn't work with it. Hopefully that will be added soon....

                Anyway, I'll try your setup out. Thanks for sharing it.

                /b
                Brett Simms

                www.heavyartillery.com
                e: brett@heavyartillery.com

                Comment


                • #23
                  Brett, awesome results. Wow. I'm going to play with this when I get home. I'll see how well I can do, which won't be as good as you both .

                  -Colin
                  Colin Senner

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    hahaha: http://www.thinkboxsoftware.com/frost/
                    Luke Szeflinski
                    :: www.lukx.com cgi

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X