Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Ryzen Processors and VRay

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    So from some preliminary tests, the Ryzen 7 1800X works pretty well, it's a little more than 2x faster than my current i7-4771 workstation.

    I did have to use the Ryzen Master tool to peg the CPU clock speed though, otherwise the clock speed of the cores went up and down and CPU usage hovered around 97%-99% all the time when rendering with V-Ray, even though the CPU temperature was quite low and Windows power profile was set to "High Performance". It seems to me like some kind of glitch with Ryzen's power savings/clock boost logic.

    Once I fixed the clock speeds to 3700 MHz for all cores in Ryzen Master, CPU load was at 100% when rendering and it gave me 3%-5% render time reduction compared to the defaults.

    I also timed other CPU benchmarks, it's interesting that the speed-up factor compared to my i7 was not consistent. For example, Cinebench was the same as V-Ray with 2.15x render time reduction, but the Corona Benchmark was only 1.97x.

    Scenes that I tested for V-Ray were the two scenes from VRayBench and ArchInteriors'37, scene 6. Benchmarks ran 3 times and I took the average values.

    Best regards,
    Vlado
    Last edited by vlado; 23-03-2017, 10:43 AM.
    I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

    Comment


    • #17
      Btw the Ryzen is exactly as fast as an old machine that has dual Xeons E5-2680 @2.7 GHz that cost a small fortune a few years ago

      Best regards,
      Vlado
      I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by vlado View Post
        Btw the Ryzen is exactly as fast as an old machine that has dual Xeons E5-2680 @2.7 GHz that cost a small fortune a few years ago

        Best regards,
        Vlado
        Ill be keeping a close eye on future developments as that sounds very cool considering its just as fast and less than half the price
        Cheers,
        -dave
        ■ ASUS ROG STRIX X399-E - 1950X ■ ASUS ROG STRIX X399-E - 2990WX ■ ASUS PRIME X399 - 2990WX ■ GIGABYTE AORUS X399 - 2990WX ■ ASUS Maximus Extreme XI with i9-9900k ■

        Comment


        • #19
          Thanks for the results Vlado, I'm pleased to hear since I'm picking up my Ryzen 1800X system parts tomorrow, after building I plan to clock it to 4.2Ghz on water as per Scan.co.uk pre-built systems and use it as a render node. Spec includes a quick Samsung 128Gb M2 PCI SSD. Full system comes in at under ?1200 incl VAT.

          Product Number AMD/YD180XBCAEWOF
          Product Desc. AMD Ryzen 7 1800X sAM4 4GHz
          Quantity 1
          Price Each 407.49
          Serial Number 6124318016

          Product Number EVGA/220-G2-0650-Y3
          Product Desc. 650W EVGA SuperNOVA G2 PSU
          Quantity 1
          Price Each 79.16
          Serial Number 0924296790

          Product Number CORS/CW-9060026-WW
          Product Desc. Corsair Hydro H110i CPU Cooler
          Quantity 1
          Price Each 91.66
          Serial Number 7523850157

          Product Number ASUS/PRIME/X370-PRO
          Product Desc. Asus Prime X370-PRO sAM4 MoBo
          Quantity 1
          Price Each 129.99
          Serial Number 9024372409

          Product Number WIN/10PRO/FQC-08929
          Product Desc. Win10 Pro 64 DVD FQC-08929
          Quantity 1
          Price Each 115.41
          Serial Number 5424340445

          Product Number SAM/MZVLW128HEGR-000
          Product Desc. 128GB SAMSUNG PM961 NVME TLC P
          Quantity 1
          Price Each 49.16
          Serial Number 8624295368

          Case and cheap GPU ?100

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by vlado View Post
            So from some preliminary tests, the Ryzen 7 1800X works pretty well, it's a little more than 2x faster than my current i7-4771 workstation.

            I did have to use the Ryzen Master tool to peg the CPU clock speed though, otherwise the clock speed of the cores went up and down and CPU usage hovered around 97%-99% all the time when rendering with V-Ray, even though the CPU temperature was quite low and Windows power profile was set to "High Performance". It seems to me like some kind of glitch with Ryzen's power savings/clock boost logic.

            Once I fixed the clock speeds to 3700 MHz for all cores in Ryzen Master, CPU load was at 100% when rendering and it gave me 3%-5% render time reduction compared to the defaults.

            I also timed other CPU benchmarks, it's interesting that the speed-up factor compared to my i7 was not consistent. For example, Cinebench was the same as V-Ray with 2.15x render time reduction, but the Corona Benchmark was only 1.97x.

            Scenes that I tested for V-Ray were the two scenes from VRayBench and ArchInteriors'37, scene 6. Benchmarks ran 3 times and I took the average values.

            Best regards,
            Vlado
            hi,
            when will VRayBench be available?

            and thank you for the Ryzen results. Hope to have a comparison with newer CPUs like 5960, 6900, 6800, etc when VRayBench available.
            Mohammadreza Mohseni

            Website | Instagram | E-Mail | Art Station | Behance | Twitter | Facebook

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by mohammadreza_mohseni View Post
              hen will VRayBench be available?
              Almost done...

              Best regards,
              Vlado
              I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

              Comment


              • #22
                great news. thank you
                Mohammadreza Mohseni

                Website | Instagram | E-Mail | Art Station | Behance | Twitter | Facebook

                Comment


                • #23
                  do you guys know if you can have two ryzen in one mother board?
                  Dmitry Vinnik
                  Silhouette Images Inc.
                  ShowReel:
                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxSJlvSwAhA
                  https://www.linkedin.com/in/dmitry-v...-identity-name

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Nope, not as of all the currently released products on the market. However, there are rumours that Asus are building a motherboard that could fit two CPUs... it's not explicit whether this is going to be for the server market with the Naples 16C 32T CPUs. If you're hoping to do both CPU and GPU do look closely, multiple GPU support (more than 3) doesn't appear to be as straightforward as on intel CPU motherboards - hopefully this will clear as more people test.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      There's some Rysen benchmarks at evermotion. And it's looking good, very good:

                      http://www.evermotion.org/articles/s...-workstations-

                      -Eugenio

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Yes, AMD is really killing it in terms of performance per dollar. Nothing that Intel can compete with at the moment in this segment. AMD did it this time and I'm happy for the breath of fresh air in the CPU market after a decade of Intel domination. However, I'm waiting to see how this pans out before shopping for AMD's excellent new processors. Even if it was a false rumor, I would have waited anyway as I want to give it some time for the BIOS'es and drivers to be ironed out of the bugs and slowdowns.
                        Last edited by Alex_M; 27-03-2017, 01:02 PM.
                        Aleksandar Mitov
                        www.renarvisuals.com
                        office@renarvisuals.com

                        3ds Max 2023.2.2 + Vray 7 Hotfix 1
                        AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-core
                        96GB DDR5
                        GeForce RTX 5090 32GB + GPU Driver 572.83

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Plus only two memory controllers - I would guess that limits a workstation to 64GB. At least until the server parts become available in the second half of the year...

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Vlado, can you show us what scene will be rendered in VRaybench? Iam really looking forward
                            AMD TR 7980X, 256GB DDR5, GeForce RTX 4090 24GB, Win 10 Pro
                            ---------------------------
                            2D | 3D | web | video
                            jiri.matys@gmail.com
                            ---------------------------
                            https://gumroad.com/jirimatys
                            https://www.artstation.com/jiri_matys
                            https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAv...Rq9X_wxwPX-0tg
                            https://www.instagram.com/jiri.matys_cgi/
                            https://www.behance.net/Jiri_Matys
                            https://cz.linkedin.com/in/jiří-matys-195a41a0

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              These are the two scenes that we have in the first version:

                              For the GPU CUDA benchmark:
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	scene_one_gpu.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	136.5 KB
ID:	867233

                              For the CPU benchmark:
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	scene_two_cpu.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	256.0 KB
ID:	867234

                              Best regards,
                              Vlado
                              I only act like I know everything, Rogers.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Vlaod, will the team release the benchmark scenes for both Max and Maya or?
                                always curious...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X