I have a question about cpu usage and bitmap sizes in scenes.
I've just done a test render of an interior, no materials applied, just to
check out what the lighting was like. I'm using light cache and IR map
and during the calc stages the cpu was being used 100%.
Then I applied a brick material to the walls, the bitmap size is 5000x7700
with 24bit colour depth and i re-rendered the scene. Now, during the calc
stage my cpu usage has dropped and hovers between 68-75% and the
light cache takes yonks to generate.
I have the bitmap pager turned on and the default geometry set to
static, i've tried playing with dynamic and that does'nt help, there is also
no displacement in the scene.
If it's of any use my system is an X2 4800, 4gig ram, windows XP64.
I'm not too sure what's going on and why it should do this, I've read
through other threads about similar problems but nothing seems to help
and the light cache is taking an absolute age.
Can someone shine some light on this please or should i just stick to
using lower res bitmaps
many many thanks
steve
I've just done a test render of an interior, no materials applied, just to
check out what the lighting was like. I'm using light cache and IR map
and during the calc stages the cpu was being used 100%.
Then I applied a brick material to the walls, the bitmap size is 5000x7700
with 24bit colour depth and i re-rendered the scene. Now, during the calc
stage my cpu usage has dropped and hovers between 68-75% and the
light cache takes yonks to generate.
I have the bitmap pager turned on and the default geometry set to
static, i've tried playing with dynamic and that does'nt help, there is also
no displacement in the scene.
If it's of any use my system is an X2 4800, 4gig ram, windows XP64.
I'm not too sure what's going on and why it should do this, I've read
through other threads about similar problems but nothing seems to help
and the light cache is taking an absolute age.
Can someone shine some light on this please or should i just stick to
using lower res bitmaps
many many thanks
steve
Comment