i'm currently doing some test with vray 4, it's extremely slow to update the preview, it's quite slow than vray 3.6, and checking vray dome adaptive i have an advantage of 3 minutes over a a time of 2 h, the difference in the same scene it's about 30 minutes , at present time i have no convenience to update to vray next,the bugs with gpu like some node not workin are the same using 3.6
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
my atempt with vray next
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by marcoz View Posti'm currently doing some test with vray 4, it's extremely slow to update the preview, it's quite slow than vray 3.6, and checking vray dome adaptive i have an advantage of 3 minutes over a a time of 2 h, the difference in the same scene it's about 30 minutes , at present time i have no convenience to update to vray next,the bugs with gpu like some node not workin are the same using 3.6
Vray is powerful wen you have big scenes.
-
One thing I have learned with v-ray Next is that it gives better results with lower settings than 3.6. If you keep settings the same 3.6 can be minutes faster than next, but when lower setting and compare only picture quality then next is a big winner with minutes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by haikalle View PostOne thing I have learned with v-ray Next is that it gives better results with lower settings than 3.6. If you keep settings the same 3.6 can be minutes faster than next, but when lower setting and compare only picture quality then next is a big winner with minutes.
Comment
-
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I've tested Vray Next (Trial) last month.
From the tests I've done so far I noticed with Adaptive Dome Light I can raise Color Threshold (and keep MSR at 6) and still have less noise than with 3.6.
With 3.6 I used to raise MSR to 12 or 16 to clean the same noise.
But at least for now, honestly, only for it (without IPR or 2.8 support) still doesn't worth the upgrade price tag in my case.
architect at oona
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by leandro_cs View PostI've tested Vray Next (Trial) last month.
From the tests I've done so far I noticed with Adaptive Dome Light I can raise Color Threshold (and keep MSR at 6) and still have less noise than with 3.6.
With 3.6 I used to raise MSR to 12 or 16 to clean the same noise.
But at least for now, honestly, only for it (without IPR or 2.8 support) still doesn't worth the upgrade price tag in my case.
I'm in the same boat about cost/benefit of upgrading. Without IPR, I'm not sure it will be worth upgrading.
Comment
-
Originally posted by andybot_cg View PostDid you need to do light portals to have it work optimally?
For interiors it's great, although for exteriors, the render times (and quality) are very close to what I get in 3.6.
architect at oona
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment