Distributed Rendering not Working - Max 9, VRay 1.5 RC3

This is following on from my last post:
http://www.chaosgroup.com/forum/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=17289
I’ve started a new topic because after further testing, I’ve realised that the issue has nothing to do with the combination of 64-bit and 32-bit machines. Hope this doesn’t break a forum rule.

I cannot use distributed rendering with Max 9. I am running Max 9 and VRay 1.5 RC3 (without a dongle). The client machine starts okay, and the V-Ray messages window says

connected to render host 172.31.1.58
connected to render host 172.31.1.29
Using 2 hosts for distributed rendering

then, after setting up the scene is says

Server 172.31.1.58 Scene loaded: starting render.
Server 172.311.58: Starting frame 725729
Server 172.31.1.29 Scene loaded: starting render.
Server 172.311.29: Starting frame 1152123
warning: Render host unknown (172.31.1.58) not responding
warning: Render host unknown (172.31.1.29) not responding

Shouldn’t the starting frame be frame 0 for both servers? And why, when they’re not responding, are they suddenly unknown?

Here is the VRay log file:
http://www.palmhousedesign.co.uk/stuff/vraylog.txt

Any help would be much appreciated.

I still have Max 8 installed on these machines along with VRay 1.5 RC3, and DR still works okay with that.

Thanks all

George

Try running the new BB manager on those PCs and set them.
Also make sure your PCs are identically installed (considering V-Ray) and the ports:
30303 - software license
30304 - hardware dongle

Best regards,
nikki Candelero

Try running the new BB manager on those PCs and set them.

??BB manager??

??set them??

I don’t understand you, candelero :sweat_smile:

I think he´s referring to the new Backburner Manager which ships with max 9.

Correct !

Best regards,
nikki Candelero

ah, okay, thanks panthon.

What do I need to set? I never had to change backburner settings before with V-Ray DR, did I…?

Try this:

Just run the manager on each slave and if the settings’ window appear, just hit < OK >.

Then try the DR.
And BTW, it may be good to have the BB 2007 installed on separate folder, so not to mix/mess up with the max8 BB 3.

Best regards,
nikki Candelero

Thanks for your time on this, Nikki.

okay, I’ve done that, it’s made no difference.

Any other ideas?

Yeah; in the System rollout of V-Ray, change the V-Ray log file to e.g. “c:\failed_log.txt”; save the scene and try to render with DR. After that, please send me to vlado@chaosgroup.com the file “c:\failed_log.txt” from one of the failed slaves, so that I can take a look at what may be wrong.

Best regards,
Vlado

okay, I’ve done that.

thanks Vlado

hello Vlado,

i’ve the same problem than GeorgeP with DR :

my server :
core2duo 6600
winxp 64bits
max 9 64bits and vray 1.5 rc3 64bits

my client :
p4 2.6ghz hyperthreading
winxp 32bits
max 9 32bits and vray 1.5 rc3 32bits

Here is the message :
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:50] Setting up 2 thread(s)
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:51] Server 192.168.0.2: Scene loaded; starting render.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:51] Server 192.168.0.2: Starting frame 728238.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:51] Server 192.168.0.2: Starting frame 728238.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:52] Server 192.168.0.2: Starting frame 728238.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:52] Server 192.168.0.2: Starting frame 728238.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:53] Server 192.168.0.2: Starting frame 728238.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:53] Server 192.168.0.2: Starting frame 728238.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:54] Server 192.168.0.2: Starting frame 728238.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:54] Server 192.168.0.2: Starting frame 728238.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:55] Server 192.168.0.2: Starting frame 728238.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:55] Server 192.168.0.2: Starting frame 728238.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:55] Server 192.168.0.2: Starting frame 728238.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:56] Server 192.168.0.2: Starting frame 728238.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:56] Server 192.168.0.2: Starting frame 728238.
[2006/Nov/4|13:02:56] Threads completed

But the DR didn’t worked (i checked the cpu usage on the client → around 48 and 50% … strange)

Yep, it’s a small bug that should be resolved with the next release; it concerns only mixed 32/64 DR.

Best regards,
Vlado

Hi Vlado, i have the same problem but it happens on a 64bit DR, no 32 nods.
I noticed that DRing a simple scene without maps make it works, as just as i load a bit complex scene, some texture etc, it doesn’t work more; any news from a newer release? A workaround would be appreciated as well.

Yes ! I have some problems too with dr. It may start on every slave
but stop after a while. Sometime, just one stops and sometimes some
of them or all of them stop.

Very unpredictable and desepointed…
Great problem.
Gael

I wonder if it is related to this problem?

http://discussion.autodesk.com/adskcsp/thread.jspa?messageID=5394297%26#5394297

I’ll test the new version of BB and get back to you.

<edit> That will be a negative… No sign that it helps with this bug.

Is this a software license issue?
We can’t get some of our slaves to pick up a license since installing R3. Have tried everything including copy the patch dll over the new install dll?

???

Oh - and this is good ole, hard working max 6.

You need to install on the render slaves with the “software license” option (*do not* copy any .dlls from other v-ray versions). This will cause the slaves to not require a license at all when 3dsmax is started in slave mode.

Best regards,
Vlado

Oops… heh… I think we were launching the new Spawner, and not the max6 version.

thanks.

I don’t mean to dig up an old post but I just installed RC3 on a fresh workstation w/ max9 and am having problems w/ the DR picking up all the processors of my slave machines. My host machine shows 4 buckets but I only get one bucket per slave machine. Each slave is a dual/dual set up that used to show 4 buckets per machine. Each slave is showing about 30% usage in the task manager. Any Ideas what I might be doing wrong? Sorry if my terminology is off but I think that you get the point. I miss my 30 buckets.

Thanks
E

got the same problem here.. only one bucket per slave, on dual dual machines