Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

VRay Test neoVISUAL v1 - free materials - test your SYSTEM

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Ah... DUH thanks. Now it rings the bell.
    =LES=

    Comment


    • #92
      my time : 4m 48s with vray 1.46.15 with this rig : amd X24400+@2700 mhz
      and 1 GB ram ( single channel ).

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by ren0
        I think I'm the fastest!!!:
        0m 43.4s
        Dual P4-2663Mhz-1024MB-WinXP
        ...
        VRay 1.09.03r
        smells funny....

        I got 5min52sec Intel/QuadP4-3045Mhz-2816MB-WinXp Adv. 1.46.14
        Eric Camper
        Studio 3D
        www.dbfinc.com/studio3d

        Comment


        • #94
          Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ 2.41 HGz, 2 GB RAM
          5m 19,7s

          Comment


          • #95
            finally got my new pc:



            AMD Opteron 285
            4GB REG ECC Kingston PC3200 RAM
            www.short-cuts.de

            Comment


            • #96
              hey blade....that sounds like a really crap time for your AMD....are you sure you ve got everything going well?
              teabag studios

              www.teabagstudios.com

              Comment


              • #97
                hmm, looks ok...pentool got 5:15 on a AMD 4800 X2, blade got 5:19 with the same CPU. i just rendered it on my AMD 4600 X2 and it took 5:28 so ithink its not that bad...
                www.short-cuts.de

                Comment


                • #98
                  Martin:
                  Blades times are basically spot on.. if you rcompare them to Olli96's which is about 2x as fast that makes sense seeing as he has 2 dual core cpus and blade only has 1 dual core cpu.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Olli96
                    finally got my new pc:
                    But no motion blur...
                    MDI Digital
                    moonjam

                    Comment


                    • hmm, yeah, didnt noticed it...i will have a look at it when i come home

                      EDIT: hmm, just did a test here at work and the motion blur shows up if i use the standard frame buffer. if i choose the vray frame buffer its not there...
                      www.short-cuts.de

                      Comment


                      • now THAT is weird

                        Comment


                        • very weird.............
                          Its worked for everyone else.
                          Are you using 1.47.03?
                          Chris Jackson
                          Shiftmedia
                          www.shiftmedia.sydney

                          Comment


                          • Yes, we are using 1.47.03

                            * If i open the file and just hit render, everything is fine.

                            * If i open the file and deactivate the Standard Rendered Frame Window and turn off save file in the Common Tab and activate only the VRay Frame Buffer and save the image from there, then it wont work.

                            * if i do it the same way as before but save the file (using the save file in the common tab), it works but the motion blur is not visible in the VRay Frame Buffer but in the saved file its there

                            So basically the motion blur doesnt shows up using the VRay Frame Buffer but if i use the the save function within the common tab its visible in the final image (the saved file) but not in the VRay Frame Buffer.

                            Olli

                            EDIT:
                            This is how it looks in the VRay Frame Buffer


                            and here is the saved file from the common tab:
                            www.short-cuts.de

                            Comment


                            • Where do you see that Ollie has two dual core...Is that what the Quad part means....I am getting ready to buy a Dual Core 4800 X2 with 4GB Ram from Monarch...for a slave...and I really wanted something kickass....For under $2000......Should I look into other options
                              Eric Camper
                              Studio 3D
                              www.dbfinc.com/studio3d

                              Comment


                              • well, i have two dual core cpu's on my motherboard...and yes, thats what the quad means. right now i got 4 buckets when rendering.
                                it shouldnt be a problem to get a 4800 x2 for under 2000$. unfortunatly you cant put one of those on a dual cpu motherboard. if you want two cpu's then you have to go for an opteron cpu...or an intel xeon...

                                Olli
                                www.short-cuts.de

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X