Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GPU benchmarks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bear75
    replied
    Originally posted by eyepiz View Post
    (4) Evga Titans SC on 3DS Max 2014

    28.04 sec

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13960[/ATTACH]
    hi, are all these cards on your workstation or are you using DR on remote slaves?
    what about using an external pci-e case?
    and last, max 2014 works correctly with vray 2.4?

    Leave a comment:


  • eyepiz
    replied
    (4) Evga Titans SC on 3DS Max 2014

    28.04 sec

    Click image for larger version

Name:	(4) Titans SC .jpg
Views:	1
Size:	327.3 KB
ID:	847421

    Leave a comment:


  • retardus
    replied
    GPU distributed rendering

    Workstation w/ Titan (6gb) + 580 (3gb)
    Workstaion w/ 470 (1.5gb)
    Laptop w/ 650M (2gb)

    46.6s

    Leave a comment:


  • retardus
    replied
    Workstation i920 18mb ram

    1:10 Titan+580
    2:43 580
    1:54 Titan

    Nvidia Driver 314.22
    Last edited by retardus; 05-04-2013, 10:49 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • stilgarna
    replied
    Hello,


    I notice that GTX670 and GTX660 ti are very close, based on specification, anyone can test the GTX660 ?

    Best regards...

    Leave a comment:


  • stilgarna
    replied
    Originally posted by 3LP View Post
    When you're speaking about distant, do you mean local network but using it as GPU node so you only spawn on it?
    Or do you have any other trick?

    Stan
    Local network with RT service.

    1 titan + 2 Gtx 580 ( 3gb ) : 49 sec

    Using network, not local. Works great.

    In our current project we will massively use RT for lighting. We'll see if we 'll add more RT node like this one.

    Leave a comment:


  • 3LP
    replied
    When you're speaking about distant, do you mean local network but using it as GPU node so you only spawn on it?
    Or do you have any other trick?

    Stan

    Leave a comment:


  • stilgarna
    replied
    Finally we are moving for a distant RT server with 2x 580GTX and 1x Titan.

    In the future we will change 580GTX for 2x Titan or better
    I'll post some results as soon as the machine is ready.


    Best regards and thank you for your help.

    Leave a comment:


  • stilgarna
    replied
    Originally posted by lukx View Post

    yep , this is why I decided to pay less and still got almost same power.
    Very smart !!! 680gtx is very desapointing...

    Originally posted by dtolios View Post

    2x 670 will be slightly slower, will consume slightly more power but you have the option for 4GB per card. 2x EVGA GTX 670 SC 4GB are cheaper than a 690 that is limited to 2GB per GPU.

    If you want the maximum computation density, atm nothing is faster than a 690, but you will be limited for tasks that can fit in the 2GB buffer.
    I need to make some additional tests to know how many vram fits our needs.

    Thank you guys !

    Leave a comment:


  • lukx
    replied
    Originally posted by stilgarna View Post
    Really close to the 680GTX. Thanks !!!
    yep , this is why I decided to pay less and still got almost same power.

    Leave a comment:


  • stilgarna
    replied
    Originally posted by lukx View Post

    you want 670 here it is with CUDA engine:
    Evga 670 GTX FTW 4GB : 3min6.4s

    In this case my next GPU upgrade will be when cards will be able to pull times below 1 minute on this test
    Really close to the 680GTX. Thanks !!!

    Leave a comment:


  • lukx
    replied
    yeah and sell my kidney to pay for electricity bills

    Leave a comment:


  • vlado
    replied
    Originally posted by lukx View Post
    In this case my next GPU upgrade will be when cards will be able to pull times below 1 minute on this test
    You can always get two Titans

    Best regards,
    Vlado

    Leave a comment:


  • lukx
    replied
    Originally posted by stilgarna View Post
    Hello here are some results at work this afternoon :

    --------------------------------GPU :
    Vray 2.40.3
    Drivers 314.07 (only Nvidia)

    2x GeForce 580GTX 3Gb : 1min28s
    1x GeForce 580GTX 3Gb : 2min44s
    1x GeForce 680GTX 2Gb : 3min03s
    1x GeForce 570GTX 1.26Gb : 3min12s
    1x GeForce 470GTX 1.26Gb : 3min57s
    1x GeForce 560Ti 1Gb : 4min50s
    1x Geforce 460GTX 1Gb : 6min40S

    --------------------------------CPU : (just for fun )
    2x Xeon E2650 : 16Min
    1x I7 980 : 32min20s
    1x I7 920 : 60min40s



    If someone can test one 670GTX, it could be nice, thank you !
    I want to know if it's better to get a 690GTX or 2x 670GTX ??

    Best regards...
    you want 670 here it is with CUDA engine:
    Evga 670 GTX FTW 4GB : 3min6.4s

    In this case my next GPU upgrade will be when cards will be able to pull times below 1 minute on this test
    Last edited by lukx; 16-03-2013, 12:13 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • dtolios
    replied
    Originally posted by stilgarna View Post
    Hello here are some results at work this afternoon :

    --------------------------------GPU :
    Vray 2.40.3
    Drivers 314.07 (only Nvidia)

    2x GeForce 580GTX 3Gb : 1min28s
    1x GeForce 580GTX 3Gb : 2min44s
    1x GeForce 680GTX 2Gb : 3min03s
    1x GeForce 570GTX 1.26Gb : 3min12s
    1x GeForce 470GTX 1.26Gb : 3min57s
    1x GeForce 560Ti 1Gb : 4min50s
    1x Geforce 460GTX 1Gb : 6min40S

    --------------------------------CPU : (just for fun )
    2x Xeon E2650 : 16Min
    1x I7 980 : 32min20s
    1x I7 920 : 60min40s



    If someone can test one 670GTX, it could be nice, thank you !
    I want to know if it's better to get a 690GTX or 2x 670GTX ??

    Best regards...
    2x 670 will be slightly slower, will consume slightly more power but you have the option for 4GB per card. 2x EVGA GTX 670 SC 4GB are cheaper than a 690 that is limited to 2GB per GPU.

    If you want the maximum computation density, atm nothing is faster than a 690, but you will be limited for tasks that can fit in the 2GB buffer.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X