If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Exciting News: Chaos acquires EvolveLAB = AI-Powered Design.
To learn more, please visit this page!
New! You can now log in to the forums with your chaos.com account as well as your forum account.
---------------------------------------------------
MSN addresses are not for newbies or warez users to contact the pros and bug them with
stupid questions the forum can answer.
Well here's my new conroe E6600. It's taking about a minute longer than expected compared to other results posted here with similar setup. Should be closer to 3:30.
INTEL CORE 2 DUO E6600 2.4 GHZ EM64T 1066MHZ
MSI P965 Neo-F
2GB CORSAIR VALUE SELECT VS1GB533D2
Setup is stock, no OC. Render was done through backburner and tested twice.
"A severed foot would make the ultimate stocking stuffer"
-Mitch Hedberg
Don't have the render to prove it but we've just had some new render nodes built: Dual woodcrest 5160s with 4GB ram and they rendered in 1.55mins with 1.5RC2. Just opened file and clicked render.
I definitly used the 1.5 file from http://www.supercreative.co.uk/vray/...estnew_1_5.zip
Just redownloaded it and tried again with the same render time. Kind of dissapointing. Shouldn't be slower through backburner should it? If anything I thought it would be faster.
"A severed foot would make the ultimate stocking stuffer"
-Mitch Hedberg
Check the file/Vray version you've rendered.
Or if it's the case, some mobos need an especific revision nº
to work properlly.
They read the chip but use it baddly.
Comment