Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

UPDATED BENCHMARK (ITS FASTER I PROMISE)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2 all : has anyone test scene for max 7 with vray 1.5 ?

    Comment


    • Opteron 285 @2800MHz (in silent mode )

      http://www.eldaco.net

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Randy
        Opteron 285 @2800MHz (in silent mode )
        Wow, that's almost identical to the Xeon 5160 (2.66GHz). For pricing, the Xeons are a little better. When I specced out machines 2 weeks ago I would have had to go with the Opteron 275 to match price.

        Comment


        • For pricing, the Xeons are a little better.
          erm, not really

          http://www.eldaco.net

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Randy
            Opteron 285 @2800MHz (in silent mode )

            The highlights look wierd? Is that the 1.47 scene? or?
            Eric Boer
            Dev

            Comment


            • the original one
              http://www.eldaco.net

              Comment


              • Same machine as initial post/test.

                Max9 64-bit + Vray 1.5 RC3 seems about 5 secs. faster than Max8 +1.5 RC2

                particle makes perfect

                Comment


                • Opteron 285 @ 2900 stable but audible
                  Max9 x64 + Vray 1.5RC3

                  http://www.eldaco.net

                  Comment


                  • AMD Athlon FX 60, 3GB RAM, Vray 1.5 RC3, MAX 9

                    Express Your Imagination - let it MAX!!!
                    www.3dkad.de

                    Comment


                    • Looking forward to seeing how one of the new Dual Quad core systems will do with the benchmark... http://www.boxxtech.com/Products/3DB...0_Overview.asp

                      -Greg

                      Comment


                      • Ok here is our INTEL QuadCore 5320 @ 1.86 GHz

                        the scene is the 1.5 corrected scene (with the subpixel corrections). I am not sure when these babies are supposed to hit the market, but this one is definitely sweet.

                        again - 8 cores in total (2 x 4cores) running at only 1.86GHz

                        Peter
                        ...keep walking...

                        Comment


                        • ok my appologies the scene was not properly set to be rendered at 8 cores, here is an update (light cache threads was set to 4 - now its changed to 8 hense the difference)

                          Peter
                          ...keep walking...

                          Comment


                          • Nice one Peter...

                            You can order the quads now from a couple companies now with delivery around 12/05. How much ram does your machine have?

                            Of course it makes me wonder if the 2.66 dual quad can go under a minute.

                            -Greg

                            Comment


                            • Impressive, I was wondering how they would clock, freaked me with the first post:P then I saw the second shaved 20+ seconds, man this stuff is getting crazy fast

                              Originally posted by GregM
                              Of course it makes me wonder if the 2.66 dual quad can go under a minute.

                              -Greg
                              I would hope so but not thinking it will, judging by the numbers, my guess would be around 1 minute 8 seconds
                              particle makes perfect

                              Comment


                              • Dual XEON 5160, 4 Gb ram... XPx64, MAX 9 64-bit, vray 1.5 rc3 64-bit

                                www.visumporec.com

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X