Do gaming cards (geforece) not do a better job at viewport speed then the quadros? I only remember the quadros outperforming the gaming cards with certain simulation tasks.
2rd generation Intel Core i7-3930 3.20GHz processor; delivers outstanding processing power for your system - I assume this is the K version? So it can be overclocked. I have this CPU but I recently purchased an Intel Core i7 4770K and overclocked it. Its around half the price and surprisingly it rendered a 20 minute scene 1 minute faster than the Intel Core i7 3930K.
64GB of DDR3 memory; tons of resources to provide awesome task handling performance.
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 GPU; astonishing graphics using 2GB of video memory. This is a really poor GPU and is old. Spend a little more money in this area and future proof yourself a bit. Maybe look at getting a TITAN as the latest Quadro cards are expensive. Also don’t forget AMD, their latest GPUs are showing good performance results
2TB hard drive and 240GB solid state drive; enjoy storing lots of digital files amazingly
DVDRW drive; burns DVDs and CDS with ease. How many discs do you burn/read? I ditched this in my latest build as I never use it. USB 3 memory sticks are cheap these days and services such as Dropbox make file transfer simples. This will save yourself a few quid.
Liquid cooling setup; dissipate heat on your system quickly
I´d also go for gaming cards. Those benchmarks are not really meaningful for Max as max/nitrous uses DirectX. DirectX is usually way faster on gaming cards.
Also the Geforce outperforms quadros in many benchmarks. For example Iray (I could magine it´s similar with VrayRT).
The quadro 4000 only has 2gb memory.A geforce gtx770 has 4gb while it´s half the price.
I´m also not sure why a system like this needs a liquid cooler wich makes it unnecessary expensive.
In September there will come a new generation of intel CPU´s. New hexacores and even an octacore for the consumer market. The prices of the new CPU´s
are pretty similar on realease as the current prices. ~40$ more. Here is a price list.
I think you can get the 4930 i7 for the same price.
I also don’t know what you’d use 64gb of ram for, that’s just going to cause issues on your machines that don’t have that. instead of spending 5 minutes optimizing your scenes as you go, you’ll end up sending renders and they’ll choke on the limit taking significantly longer to render. I use fusion a lot which eats ram in an instant and i’d still get 32gb of better or faster ram.
With VRay 3.0 and the Embree option, is it worth it moving away form intel?[quote=“Avesani, post:3, topic:45275, username:Avesani”]
Next time I get a new workstation, I think I might push for a dual XEON. Just another spanner in your works
[/quote]
what motherboard is 1200??
e: oh, you’re set on 64gb of ram. you’re spending over a thousand dollars extra on another 32gb of ram. we work on some crazy scenes and render them on 16gb, only people who do editing even have 32gb at our place.
I have a z820, now relegated to being a renderslave… they are nice and compact for what they are, but they run pretty damn hot AND NOISY. I know Bertrand Benoit has had a similar experience with his z820, and even had problems with faulty ram. (see comments: GPU maintenance — PETER GUTHRIE)
I now am using something I built myself, which is what I should have done all along. It is almost completely silent and runs at about 55deg under load compared to 80 (conservative average…) for the Z820.
When building mine, I referred a lot to the cooling strategy employed by these guys in the US, maybe worth a look?? Or maybe someone else has experience with them? Custom Workstation Computers | Puget Systems
Agree with Peter, the best is for you to build it yourself or ask a friend to build and you just buy the pieces. About the cooling, as long as the case has a nice air flow design, and not like those HP, you don’t even need water cooling