If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Exciting News: Chaos acquires EvolveLAB = AI-Powered Design.
To learn more, please visit this page!
New! You can now log in to the forums with your chaos.com account as well as your forum account.
gee. where are the examples people!! get with it hehehe
---------------------------------------------------
MSN addresses are not for newbies or warez users to contact the pros and bug them with
stupid questions the forum can answer.
ill post some more stuff when its done. if peeps are interested. cant show the full thing as of NDA's. well not until march. when said console is released in europe.
heres an earlier one
---------------------------------------------------
MSN addresses are not for newbies or warez users to contact the pros and bug them with
stupid questions the forum can answer.
nice stuff unknown.
I think maybe the temperature of the fire towards the end of the "firewheel" is a bit too much, you lose a lot of detail in the fire
ya the wheel sucks a bit. that was the first tihng i did as soon as i downloaded it. The final one will have a weeks more knowledge applyed to it. Still out of the box its great. But lots of aniamted maps and turbulance is needed to get exacly the correct result you are after.
dont feel the need for vray on this yet. all scanline, as a layer, then added to a comp.
Definitely use vray to render - it doesn't give any advantage to the look but since you get to use undersampling it renders a hell of a lot quicker - take a frame that's maybe a minute in the scanline and switch over to vray - use the adaptive subdivision at -1,2 or even lower and it'll render much quicker - the scanline is brute force so it can't take any shortcuts in the simpler areas.
dont feel the need for vray on this yet. all scanline, as a layer, then added to a comp.
Definitely use vray to render - it doesn't give any advantage to the look but since you get to use undersampling it renders a hell of a lot quicker - take a frame that's maybe a minute in the scanline and switch over to vray - use the adaptive subdivision at -1,2 or even lower and it'll render much quicker - the scanline is brute force so it can't take any shortcuts in the simpler areas.
ill give it a go! i wasnt really sure if vray would make any difference.
jonnybefree: it was a really low sim quality, so about 10mins, rendertime was about 10secs a frame. Im currently doing an HD size explosion, the sims times are around 8-12hrs on a 32bit machine. rendertimes, well i shouldnt think they will be more than 10mins a frame.
Testing this thing at work. Nice. Realy a mix between aura and afterburn (about ui)...
BTW - I love x64 version Also love small tiny preview window. For several days been using fume, and no problems with vray (I wasn't doing smth great and big, as it slow, when it comes to biig papa calculations - no surprise btw ). Will try to compare aura and fume later. Old aura self-made fire picture (as aura doesn't work now ) and new fume Stay tuned
P.S. Slow in viewport
I just can't seem to trust myself
So what chance does that leave, for anyone else?
---------------------------------------------------------
CG Artist
Comment