Originally posted by stellwagenc
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NEW Benchmark scene (Max 8 Vray RC3 required)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by arobbert View PostHow many passes did you set for the light cache? Are you hyper threading?
The Bios has a HT-Mode and this is enabled. The CPU runs with 2,53 Ghz @ 100%. It overclocked itself (CPU Feature).
In a production environment overclock does not make sense!CAD construction & visualization @ www.wsv-gruppe.de
Comment
-
Hi there,
I know it's a bit off subjet, but I find this video on boxxtech site :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tDK9kj96Ck
I really wonder how this machine could get 51k point out off cinebench...
I have search the web to find some other persons that had this processors in there hands. I found that these people had achieve "only" 30k point with the platform Skulltrail and a dual QX9775 @ 4ghtz. The same as sown on the video.
http://forum.hardware.fr/hfr/Overclo...1.htm#t1614123
So what's the secret of boxxtech ? They have nearby the double of points with the same processors... ?
Does someone had a someday had a boxx like that in his hand and tried Vray Benchmark ? I think it could kick our ass, no ?3LP Team
Comment
-
-
So I've managed to get my hands on another super quick box. These chips aren't quite out yet and I've run in to a problem with them in that Max won't run with hyperthreading enabled but they are fast none the less.
I've run a couple different benchmarks through this and a couple other boxes including, my aging 8 processor, Opteron 280 box.
Results are below.
We'll start with the slowest box.
8 processor, AMD Opteron 280
Windows Advanced server 64
Vray 1.5 sp4
Intel E5530 2.4ghz Xeon. 4 cores per processor.
I ran test with and without HT on. While HT gave a slight boost, it was pretty negligable. I'm not showing the results here but I ran Cinebench and the results there were similar between HT on and off.
Here are the results with HT on.
X5560 2.6ghz Xeon 6 cores per processor
I could get Cinebench to run with/without HT but I could not get Max to run with HT on. These results are without HT. What's interesting is that the difference between results in Cinebench with/without HT was significant. There was a 20% increasse in speed with HT on. I'm bummed I can't test this with Max/Vray at the moment.
These processors have a lot of potential.
Comment
-
yikes thats fast. Vlado what happened to that benchmark you were working on? I redownloaded this one the other day found on a few pages back. Man thats an old scene. Pre 'ALOT' of vray features. I even spent some time readjusting it for use with linear workflow/vray camera etc etc, in the aim of maybe rereleasing it, but I remembered your post awhile back about your own you were making.
Comment
-
I think it would be super handy if one of the administrators was able to make a table with all these fine benchmark-results.
That way it would be waay easier to compare results and hardware.
Offcourse you would have to stick with only one scene.
I would suggest the following columns:
number of CPUs > CPU type > CPU clock > RAM amount > Operating System > Rendertime > System price in € > price/performance index
Comment
Comment